On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 12:51:04PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Beautiful piece of work, José. Looks so much cleaner now.
Thanks, :-)
--
José Abílio Matos
LyX and docbook a perfect match. :-)
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 11:00:03AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> Actually, José, I think that you can simplify insetcharstyle.C even
> further:
>
> int InsetCharStyle::linuxdoc(Buffer const & buffer, std::ostream & os,
> OutputParams const & params) const
> {
>
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Beautiful piece of work, José. Looks so much cleaner now.
> On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 20:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, José, I think that you can simplify insetcharstyle.C even
further:
int InsetCharStyle::linuxdoc(Buffer const & buffer, std::ostream & os,
Beautiful piece of work, JosÃ. Looks so much cleaner now.
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 20:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
- Martin
--
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 12:53, Josà AbÃlio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 09:42:29AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >
> > I don't remember, and I don't seem to have the AGU-Article dtd anymore.
>
> I think that I still have a copy that you sent me. :-)
>
> > Note that also the s
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 09:42:29AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> I don't remember, and I don't seem to have the AGU-Article dtd anymore.
I think that I still have a copy that you sent me. :-)
> Note that also the sectioning counter names differ from their LaTeX
> names. Are you sure you und
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 23:20, Josà AbÃlio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 10:49:29AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >
> > > Using pseudo code the it would be:
> > >
> > > Is there any label in paragraph?
> > > (Yes) then use it
> > > (No) else include the automatical
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 10:49:29AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > Using pseudo code the it would be:
> >
> > Is there any label in paragraph?
> > (Yes) then use it
> > (No) else include the automatically generated.
>
> ...with # substitution if appropriate.
>
> That's p
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 10:37, Josà AbÃlio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 08:36:17AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >
> > As I understand it, the manual label overrides any automatic one. So in
> > this case the previous paragraph would have label para150 and the next
> > para152 (a
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 08:36:17AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> As I understand it, the manual label overrides any automatic one. So in
> this case the previous paragraph would have label para150 and the next
> para152 (and these change dynamically as you add and remove paragraphs)
> but the l
On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 21:55, Josà AbÃlio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 05:15:39PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > >
> > > Then probably the first line inside the if should be instead:
> > >
> > > id += " " + bstyle->latexparam();
> >
> > No no... rather, keep it as it is
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 01:00, Josà AbÃlio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 05:15:39PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >
> > I still feel you're making this too complicated :-)
>
> Mais au contraire, mon cher ami. ;-)
>
> [This started as an simple answer and ended as a rant. Y
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 05:15:39PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> I still feel you're making this too complicated :-)
Mais au contraire, mon cher ami. ;-)
[This started as an simple answer and ended as a rant. You have been
warned... ;-)]
ids are attributes that are allowed in every ele
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 05:15:39PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >
> > Then probably the first line inside the if should be instead:
> >
> > id += " " + bstyle->latexparam();
>
> No no... rather, keep it as it is, but shift it to inside the second
> if-statement, i.e., one line down.
O
On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 16:39, Josà AbÃlio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 04:13:23PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >
> > At least this looks correct now... but can't you (referring to before
> > this proposed patch) just place the counters thingy *inside* the second
> > if-statemen
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 04:13:23PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> At least this looks correct now... but can't you (referring to before
> this proposed patch) just place the counters thingy *inside* the second
> if-statement? Again, what do I miss?
>
> Like this
>
> if (!bstyle->latexp
On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 15:38, Josà AbÃlio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 03:25:50PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >
> > Wrong fix I think.
> >
> > What if style->latexparam() is non-empty, but does not contain a '#'?
> >
> > :-)
>
> I think that we need to agree on a common s
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 03:25:50PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> Wrong fix I think.
>
> What if style->latexparam() is non-empty, but does not contain a '#'?
>
> :-)
I think that we need to agree on a common syntax for string substitution
and place that on openTag. :-)
Second try, somet
On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 16:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> CVSROOT: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot
> Module name: lyx-devel
> Repository: lyx-devel/src/
> Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/10/25 13:20:02
>
> Modified files:
> lyx-devel/src/: ChangeLog output_docboo
19 matches
Mail list logo
