On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 12:53, Josà AbÃlio Oliveira Matos wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 09:42:29AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > > I don't remember, and I don't seem to have the AGU-Article dtd anymore. > > I think that I still have a copy that you sent me. :-) > > > Note that also the sectioning counter names differ from their LaTeX > > names. Are you sure you understand this code? :-) > > Your code is really easy to read. And the work that you have done with the > layout files is amazing. > > Congratulations. And I really mean it you have clean my code to such a > point that I could even understand it, and that allowed the latest rewrite. > :-)
Blush, blush. Realize though that AGU-Article dtd is currently only partially supported. > Your changes simplied so much the logic that I will merge both the docbook > and linuxdoc support at the paragraph list level, because they are the same. > Everything is controled from ours xsl, pardon textclasses ;-), files. That would be great. > This is quite interesting. > > > > Note that the result is still _id="para50"_ as it should. > > > > OK. > > I will apply the patch later. :-) > -- Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
