On Tuesday 13 June 2006 13:16, Helge Hafting wrote:
> > Or did I misunderstood what you said?
> >
>
> I think we agree about this, it is Lars that seems to hold back.
I would like not to forget this issue. Please could you fill a bugzilla
entry for 1.5.0. I agree that something needs to be
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Friday 09 June 2006 12:20, Helge Hafting wrote:
I think "no lines" is the better way. No old stuff breaks. There
isn't even an update of the document format.
I don't understand you here. There is nothing related with an update for the
file format.
Exactly
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> The question here, as far I understand, it is one about
Jose'> templates. When you insert a table, it appears a table that
Jose'> follows a given template.
One idea I had about template
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 08:54:27AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > I think one of the solutions i and others outlined would be better.
> |
> | but that is cheating since it involves a new feature.
> |
> | the que
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> The question here, as far I understand, it is one about
Jose'> templates. When you insert a table, it appears a table that
Jose'> follows a given template.
One idea I had about templates was to have the possibility to add
insets to
On Friday 09 June 2006 12:20, Helge Hafting wrote:
> I think "no lines" is the better way. No old stuff breaks. There
> isn't even an update of the document format.
I don't understand you here. There is nothing related with an update for the
file format.
The question here, as far I underst
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > I think one of the solutions i and others outlined would be better.
|
| but that is cheating since it involves a new feature.
|
| the question is what is better:
|
| 1. have lines the way we h
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Fine with me. I find i anooying myself.
others?
I'm also always deleting the lines, but only in order to get the booktabs ERT
stuff in. My take on it is: add a "border style" combo to the tabular create
dialog, which
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Fine with me. I find i anooying myself.
>
> others?
I'm also always deleting the lines, but only in order to get the booktabs ERT
stuff in. My take on it is: add a "border style" combo to the tabular create
dialog, which lets your chose: no borders,
> That will just be a poll... just as an input to the decision process.
that's the idea...
"Leuven, E." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| i just send a mail to the user list...
That will just be a poll... just as an input to the decision process.
--
Lgb
i just send a mail to the user list...
-Original Message-
From: news on behalf of Paul A. Rubin
Sent: Thu 6/8/06 16:48
To: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: long standing annoyance with tables
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> I am reluctant of changing
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > I am reluctant of changing something that has been the default for a
| > long time.
|
| i understand that, but in this case i think that the default is very
| idiosyncratic and an inconvenience for most.
|
| i would really
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I am reluctant of changing something that has been the default for a
long time.
i understand that, but in this case i think that the default is very
idiosyncratic and an inconvenience for most.
i would really urge you to allow this in...
How
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I am reluctant of changing something that has been the default for a
long time.
i understand that, but in this case i think that the default is very
idiosyncratic and an inconvenience for most.
i would really urge you to allow this in...
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > I think one of the solutions i and others outlined would be better.
|
| but that is cheating since it involves a new feature.
|
| the question is what is better:
|
| 1. have lines the way we have now
| 2. have no lines
I
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I think one of the solutions i and others outlined would be better.
but that is cheating since it involves a new feature.
the question is what is better:
1. have lines the way we have now
2. have no lines
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Andre Poenitz wrote:
| > Fine with me. I find i anooying myself.
|
| others?
|
| i really think that this should go in...
I think one of the solutions i and others outlined would be better.
--
Lgb
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Fine with me. I find i anooying myself.
others?
i really think that this should go in...
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 10:12:27PM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> is that it gets inserted with silly lines
>
> the attached patch gets rid of them
>
> can i commit? please?!
Fine with me. I find i anooying myself.
Andre'
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Note that I am not against this change, I just want us to be aware of
implications and have well founded reasons for the change.
That said, IMHO we should make the behaviour in LyX as close as
possible to what you get from using the LaTeX styles/classes manually.
So if
"Paul A. Rubin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | is that it gets inserted with silly lines
| > Why are they silly?
|
| I think it's generally considered bad form to have many horizontal
| lines, or *any* vertical lines, in
On Friday 02 June 2006 07:10, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > | is that it gets inserted with silly lines
> >
> > Why are they silly?
>
> i think that nobody uses line formatting like this. like paul the first
> thing i do after inse
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| is that it gets inserted with silly lines
Why are they silly?
i think that nobody uses line formatting like this. like paul the first
thing i do after inserting a table is selecting the whole thing and
unset all the lines.
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| is that it gets inserted with silly lines
Why are they silly?
I think it's generally considered bad form to have many horizontal
lines, or *any* vertical lines, in a table. I confess that the first
thing I do after inser
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| is that it gets inserted with silly lines
Why are they silly?
| the attached patch gets rid of them
Doesn't this change default behaviour that we have had for a very long
time?
| can i commit? please?!
whining does not help.
--
Lgb
is that it gets inserted with silly lines
the attached patch gets rid of them
can i commit? please?!
Index: tabular.C
===
--- tabular.C (revision 13978)
+++ tabular.C (working copy)
@@ -319,9 +319,9 @@
multicolumn(
27 matches
Mail list logo
