On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 08:54:27AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | > I think one of the solutions i and others outlined would be better. > | > | but that is cheating since it involves a new feature. > | > | the question is what is better: > | > | 1. have lines the way we have now > | 2. have no lines > > I am reluctant of changing something that has been the default for a > long time. If 2 is better than 1 is not the only criteria for changing > anything.
IMNSHO 2 is better than 1 even cosidering the long standing tradition of 'many lines'. Andre'
