> I don't understand this. Perhaps you should try current SVN (which contains
> my latest patch)
Ah! Now it looks much better!! :-)
No problems visible! I will tell you, if I encounter other ones.
Thanks a lot!
Sebastian
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Ma
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:41:55 +0200
sebastian guttenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ah, cursed whitespace. Just replace the tabs by eight spaces.
>
> ah, ok. Did that. I have
> "good news": I get a different error message now ;-) :
>
> :~/lyx-devel$ lyxdev
> Traceback (most recent call last)
> Ah, cursed whitespace. Just replace the tabs by eight spaces.
ah, ok. Did that. I have
"good news": I get a different error message now ;-) :
:~/lyx-devel$ lyxdev
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/basti/lyx-devel/lib/./lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx", line 78, in
doc.convert()
File "/ho
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 04:51:44PM +0200, sebastian guttenberg wrote:
> Hi Martin
> Sorry, but it still doesn't work for me. I'm getting the follwong
> message in xterm:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/home/basti/lyx-devel/lib/./lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx", line 78, in
>
> doc.convert(
Hi Martin
Sorry, but it still doesn't work for me. I'm getting the follwong
message in xterm:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/basti/lyx-devel/lib/./lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx", line 78, in
doc.convert()
File "/home/basti/lyx-devel/lib/lyx2lyx/LyX.py", line 416, in convert
steps =
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:15:16PM +0200, sebastian guttenberg wrote:
> > Try the attached (on top of newest SVN)
>
> Things indeed have changed now! I get an error message:
> "Conversion script failed" and the file is not loaded at all !?
>
> BTW: Was the new patch (you called it x.diff) only fo
> Try the attached (on top of newest SVN)
Things indeed have changed now! I get an error message:
"Conversion script failed" and the file is not loaded at all !?
BTW: Was the new patch (you called it x.diff) only for the quotation
mark-bug, or also for the dollar-bug? Because the last quotation m
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:58:47 +0200
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:30:04 + (UTC)
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > -# Put here the conversions needed from LaTeX string
> > > -# t
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:30:04 + (UTC)
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > -# Put here the conversions needed from LaTeX string
> > -# to LyXText:
> > +# Put here the conversions needed from LaTeX string to LyXText:
>
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -# Put here the conversions needed from LaTeX string
> -# to LyXText:
> +# Put here the conversions needed from LaTeX string to LyXText:
> +# Umlauted characters:
> +fullcontent = fullcontent.replace(r'\\\"a', u'รค'
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 09:02:01PM +0200, sebastian guttenberg wrote:
> Hi Martin
> Sorry for the late response, but I was very busy today.
>
> > The quotation patch is in bugzilla error nr. 4333, you could
> > try that too.
>
> A while ago I have added another comment to this bug, that the patc
Hi Martin
Sorry for the late response, but I was very busy today.
> The quotation patch is in bugzilla error nr. 4333, you could
> try that too.
A while ago I have added another comment to this bug, that the patch
doesn't work for me. I also attached an example file. Have you tried
that? Does it
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:24:23 +0200
sebastian guttenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry!! I confused everything! Your patch was the fix for the
> dollar-signs, right!? Yes that works now perfectly! Thanks!
> I was always testing with the quotation marks ;-)
> But the latter still doesn't work f
Sorry!! I confused everything! Your patch was the fix for the
dollar-signs, right!? Yes that works now perfectly! Thanks!
I was always testing with the quotation marks ;-)
But the latter still doesn't work for me...
- Sebastian
P.S. The rest is just virus-message ;-)
--
This message has been sc
Hi Martin!
Sorry, I have to ask you some more stupid questions.
Thanks first for the description, how to remove the patch. That worked.
And attaching z.diff worked also. Then I compiled again, but again I get
the old behaviour!?
Let me make sure that I am not doing s.th. very stupid:
- I ran "make
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 09:55:11PM +0200, sebastian guttenberg wrote:
> > BTW did you revert the previous patch before applying the
> > new one?
>
> No. How do I do that? Sorry, as I said, I don't know anything about
> patching...
If you still have the patch, you do
patch -R old.diff
(both comm
> BTW did you revert the previous patch before applying the
> new one?
No. How do I do that? Sorry, as I said, I don't know anything about
patching...
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 08:29:55PM +0200, sebastian guttenberg wrote:
> Thanks for sending the patch! Unfortunately, I am unable to do the
> patching. I obtain the following:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/lyx-devel/lib/lyx2lyx$ patch patching file lyx_1_6.py
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 359.
> 1 out of 1 hunk F
Thanks for sending the patch! Unfortunately, I am unable to do the
patching. I obtain the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/lyx-devel/lib/lyx2lyx$ patch
lyx_1_6.py.rej
Description: application/reject
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 02:05:10PM +0200, sebastian guttenberg wrote:
> > That would be good (or a small part of your file containing
> > problem entries), as I am currently working in the blind.
>
> Ok, here's a file with only the index-entries. Bug shows up for me with
> this short file as well.
> That would be good (or a small part of your file containing
> problem entries), as I am currently working in the blind.
Ok, here's a file with only the index-entries. Bug shows up for me with
this short file as well.
- Sebastian
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous conte
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 12:32:17PM +0200, sebastian guttenberg wrote:
BTW I posted a patch to bug 4333 (the \" problem) on bugzilla.
- Martin
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 12:32:17PM +0200, sebastian guttenberg wrote:
> Hi Martin!
> Thanks for the answers and the patch! And sorry for the late response. I
> haven't been online yesterday...
> However, the patch doesn't seem to change anything for me. I obtain the
> same corrupted index-entries.
Hi Martin!
Thanks for the answers and the patch! And sorry for the late response. I
haven't been online yesterday...
However, the patch doesn't seem to change anything for me. I obtain the
same corrupted index-entries.
I am not very experienced in patching, so let me shortly describe what I
did, s
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 05:17:41PM +0200, sebastian guttenberg wrote:
> Hi, I just tried to send an example file to demonstrate a bug in the
> index-insets of 1.6.0svn, but the server rejects the file, because it
> is too big. To whom shall I send the file? The bug is related to index
> of course
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 05:17:41PM +0200, sebastian guttenberg wrote:
> Hi, I just tried to send an example file to demonstrate a bug in the
> index-insets of 1.6.0svn, but the server rejects the file, because it
> is too big. To whom shall I send the file? The bug is related to index
> of course
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 05:17:41PM +0200, sebastian guttenberg wrote:
> Hi, I just tried to send an example file to demonstrate a bug in the
> index-insets of 1.6.0svn, but the server rejects the file, because it
> is too big. To whom shall I send the file? The bug is related to index
> of course
Hi, I just tried to send an example file to demonstrate a bug in the
index-insets of 1.6.0svn, but the server rejects the file, because it
is too big. To whom shall I send the file? The bug is related to index
of course and also to the import of lyx1.5.2 documents in lyx1.6.0svn.
To be more precis
28 matches
Mail list logo
