On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 12:32:17PM +0200, sebastian guttenberg wrote: > Hi Martin! > Thanks for the answers and the patch! And sorry for the late response. I > haven't been online yesterday... > However, the patch doesn't seem to change anything for me. I obtain the > same corrupted index-entries. > I am not very experienced in patching, so let me shortly describe what I > did, so that you can judge whether the patch was really correctly > implemented: > I copied the patch x.diff to lyx-devel/lib/lyx2lyx . I changed to this > directory and simply typed > patch <x.diff > There was a short answer that the patch was applied. Then I compiled and
Seems OK... > installed again... > If you want, I can send you my lyx-file, so that you can have a look > yourself. > Best, Sebastian That would be good (or a small part of your file containing problem entries), as I am currently working in the blind. - Martin > On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 16:21 +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 05:17:41PM +0200, sebastian guttenberg wrote: > > > Hi, I just tried to send an example file to demonstrate a bug in the > > > index-insets of 1.6.0svn, but the server rejects the file, because it > > > is too big. To whom shall I send the file? The bug is related to index > > > of course and also to the import of lyx1.5.2 documents in lyx1.6.0svn. > > > To be more precise: I opened a lyx1.5.2-document with lyx1.6.0. A lot of > > > index entries were severely corrupted and contained for example only > > > dollar signs instead of some math-expression which had been there > > > before. > > > - Sebastian > > > > Does the attached patch handle your math-in-index correctly? > > If so, this is the way to go. > > > > - Martin > > > > > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. >
