Re: boost signals question

2002-06-26 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 26 June 2002 3:00 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | On Wednesday 26 June 2002 2:22 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> | Lars, > >> | > >> | I find that there's no problem in using boost::bind

Re: boost signals question

2002-06-26 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wednesday 26 June 2002 2:22 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> | Lars, >> | >> | I find that there's no problem in using boost::bind on a class that is >> | NOT derived from boost::trackable. So what's the

Re: boost signals question

2002-06-26 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 26 June 2002 2:22 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Lars, > | > | I find that there's no problem in using boost::bind on a class that is > | NOT derived from boost::trackable. So what's the point of > | boost::trackable? > > That you can re

Re: boost signals question

2002-06-26 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars, > | I find that there's no problem in using boost::bind on a class that is NOT | derived from boost::trackable. So what's the point of boost::trackable? That you can remove/delete the object from the trackable class and have this reflected in th

boost signals question

2002-06-26 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars, I find that there's no problem in using boost::bind on a class that is NOT derived from boost::trackable. So what's the point of boost::trackable? Angus