On Wednesday 26 June 2002 3:00 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Wednesday 26 June 2002 2:22 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> | Lars,
> >> |
> >> | I find that there's no problem in using boost::bind
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 26 June 2002 2:22 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | Lars,
>> |
>> | I find that there's no problem in using boost::bind on a class that is
>> | NOT derived from boost::trackable. So what's the
On Wednesday 26 June 2002 2:22 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Lars,
> |
> | I find that there's no problem in using boost::bind on a class that is
> | NOT derived from boost::trackable. So what's the point of
> | boost::trackable?
>
> That you can re
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars,
>
| I find that there's no problem in using boost::bind on a class that is NOT
| derived from boost::trackable. So what's the point of boost::trackable?
That you can remove/delete the object from the trackable class and
have this reflected in th
Lars,
I find that there's no problem in using boost::bind on a class that is NOT
derived from boost::trackable. So what's the point of boost::trackable?
Angus