On Wednesday 26 June 2002 2:22 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Lars, > | > | I find that there's no problem in using boost::bind on a class that is > | NOT derived from boost::trackable. So what's the point of > | boost::trackable? > > That you can remove/delete the object from the trackable class and > have this reflected in the signal (i.e. the slot gets automatically > deleted from the signal) > > same purpose as SigC::Object
I could not connect to a class object that was not derived from SigC::Object. Failed at compile time. The fact that I CAN connect to a class object that is not derived from boost::trackable suggests that this is an optiisation thing only. Especially since all seems to work fine. Anyway, I'lll add the necessary derivations. Just found this interesting and worth mentioning. Angus
