Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 26 June 2002 2:22 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | Lars,
>> |
>> | I find that there's no problem in using boost::bind on a class that is
>> | NOT derived from boost::trackable. So what's the point of
>> | boost::trackable?
>>
>> That you can remove/delete the object from the trackable class and
>> have this reflected in the signal (i.e. the slot gets automatically
>> deleted from the signal)
>>
>> same purpose as SigC::Object
>
| I could not connect to a class object that was not derived from SigC::Object.
| Failed at compile time. The fact that I CAN connect to a class object that is
| not derived from boost::trackable suggests that this is an optiisation thing
| only.
>
| Especially since all seems to work fine.
... I guess only as long as you do not delete the objects with the
slots...
--
Lgb
