gt;>>> Will that make it into 1.5? It looks so gorgeous :)
>>
Abdelrazak> Yes, it's already in... Some bugs remain though.
>> What is already in?
Abdelrazak> The Toc dock widget? Or was he asking about the drawer?
No, like the title says, "Unified title and toolbar on Mac OS X".
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jan Peters wrote:
Will that make it into 1.5? It looks so gorgeous :)
Abdelrazak> Yes, it's already in... Some bugs remain though.
What is already in?
The Toc dock widget? Or was he askin
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jan Peters wrote:
>> Will that make it into 1.5? It looks so gorgeous :)
Abdelrazak> Yes, it's already in... Some bugs remain though.
What is already in?
Jan Peters wrote:
Will that make it into 1.5? It looks so gorgeous :)
Yes, it's already in... Some bugs remain though.
Abdel.
Will that make it into 1.5? It looks so gorgeous :)
On 3/13/07, Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I compiled LyX with the current Qt snapshot and unified toolbar:
http://tinyurl.com/2taqf6
Fonts are broken though. Everything appears in helvetica.
Schimmi
> Maybe this is interes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:55:14AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Andre> Cursor Left/Right should be a reasonable shortcut for
Andre> Promote/Demote in
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 04:06:40PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:21:05AM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> >> alt+up and alt+down move pars up and down. maybe it is natural to
> >> have similar bindi
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:55:14AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> Cursor Left/Right should be a reasonable shortcut for
> Andre> Promote/Demote in the arrow verfsion, shouldn't it?
>
> These are word left/right in cua, I
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:21:05AM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
>> alt+up and alt+down move pars up and down. maybe it is natural to
>> have similar bindings here?
Andre> Alt+up and alt+down move me one step up and down in the grid o
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:21:05AM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> alt+up and alt+down move pars up and down. maybe it is natural to have
> similar bindings here?
Alt+up and alt+down move me one step up and down in the grid of virtual
screens and has done like that since the introduction of X in the
On Mar 14, 2007, at 10:19 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> Not on Mac (mac.bind): they move the cursor to the
Bennett> beginning/end of the line.
And that is a standard mac binding?
Yes.
Bennett
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> Not on Mac (mac.bind): they move the cursor to the
Bennett> beginning/end of the line.
And that is a standard mac binding?
On Mar 14, 2007, at 5:58 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
chemnitz.de> writes:
Andre> Cursor Left/Right should be a reasonable shortcut for
Andre> Promote/Demote in the arrow verfsion, shouldn't it?
These are word left/right i
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Andre> Cursor Left/Right should be a reasonable shortcut for
Andre> Promote/Demote in the arrow verfsion, shouldn't it
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Edwin" == Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Edwin> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
alt+up and alt+down move pars up and down. maybe it is natural to
have similar bindings here?
But then how would you bind Outline-Up and Down?
Edwin> Ctrl+up and Ctrl+down ?
The
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> Cursor Left/Right should be a reasonable shortcut for
Andre> Promote/Demote in the arrow verfsion, shouldn't it?
These are word left/right in cua, I think.
No these are Ctrl+left/right in cua. Alt+left/ri
> "Edwin" == Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Edwin> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>> alt+up and alt+down move pars up and down. maybe it is natural to
>>> have similar bindings here?
>> But then how would you bind Outline-Up and Down?
Edwin> Ctrl+up and Ctrl+down ?
These are already bo
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> Cursor Left/Right should be a reasonable shortcut for
Andre> Promote/Demote in the arrow verfsion, shouldn't it?
These are word left/right in cua, I think.
JMarc
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Indeed... The correct solution would be to modify the cua
Abdelrazak> and all other bindings to not use any Alt-XXX shortcut
Abdelrazak> because these should be reserved to GUI accessible element
Abdelrazak> (menu _and
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> On Mar 13, 2007, at 11:44 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Also, Bennett, are there instances where we use normal dialogs and
>> sheets would be more appropriate?
Bennett> Sheets are appropriate for document-specific modal win
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> I think if we implement this as a drawer -- which is quite
Bennett> nice -- we should not also allow a docked widget or floating
Bennett> window. (That's not the Mac way: simplify to avoid
Bennett> confusion.)
100% agreed. Abdel
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
alt+up and alt+down move pars up and down. maybe it is natural to
have similar bindings here?
But then how would you bind Outline-Up and Down?
Ctrl+up and Ctrl+down ?
Wouldn't it be better to affect those to pars up and down instead and
alt+arr
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
alt+up and alt+down move pars up and down. maybe it is natural to have
similar bindings here?
But then how would you bind Outline-Up and Down?
Ctrl+up and Ctrl+down ?
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:11:25PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
FWIW, I'd also like to see toc widget narrower if possible.
Abdelrazak> I guess we need to fin
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:11:25PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
FWIW, I'd also like to see toc widget narrower if possible.
Abdelrazak> I guess we need to find shorter names for "
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:11:25PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>>FWIW, I'd also like to see toc widget narrower if possible.
> >
> >Abdelrazak> I guess we need to find shorter names for "P
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
FWIW, I'd also like to see toc widget narrower if possible.
Abdelrazak> I guess we need to find shorter names for "Promote" and
Abdelrazak> "Demote" the
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
FWIW, I'd also like to see toc widget narrower if possible.
Abdelrazak> I guess we need to find shorter names for "Promote" and
Abdelrazak> "Demote" then... Or we could arrange
On Mar 13, 2007, at 12:04 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Personally I don't see much the point of drawers. If I
Abdelrazak> want a maximum width for the work area, I maximize the
Abdelrazak> win
On Mar 13, 2007, at 11:44 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Also, Bennett, are there instances where we use normal dialogs and
sheets would be more appropriate?
Sheets are appropriate for document-specific modal windows, used
mostly for opening and saving documents. (The GUI advance on Mac was
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Personally I don't see much the point of drawers. If I
Abdelrazak> want a maximum width for the work area, I maximize the
Abdelrazak> window. So drawer of dockwidget, the result would be
Abdelr
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Personally I don't see much the point of drawers. If I
Abdelrazak> want a maximum width for the work area, I maximize the
Abdelrazak> window. So drawer of dockwidget, the result would be
Abdelrazak> exactly the same. T
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> 136 is big enough not to be send to the list. On a 56k modem
Andre> line with average connection that's ~30 sec. Now imagine what
Andre> happens if each of the ~300 mails per day in my inbox were that
Andre>
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
FWIW, I'd also like to see toc widget narrower if possible.
Abdelrazak> I guess we need to find shorter names for "Promote" and
Abdelrazak> "Demote" then... Or we could arrange the buttons like
Abdelraz
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> I would also like that the Tab key is affected to the
Abdelrazak> "Promote" LFUN if we are within a section. And Shift-Tab
Abdelrazak> would be affected to "Demote" of course.
Would be nice.
JMarc
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Mar 13, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
There are also focus issues, which are also issues with the dockable
TOC. Clicking on an item in the TOC causes the focus to be in the TOC
(with no cursor visible in the main document window). Typi
On Mar 13, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
There are also focus issues, which are also issues with the
dockable TOC. Clicking on an item in the TOC causes the focus to
be in the TOC (with no cursor visible in the main document
window). Typing has no effect
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> 136 is big enough not to be send to the list. On a 56k modem
Andre> line with average connection that's ~30 sec. Now imagine what
Andre> happens if each of the ~300 mails per day in my inbox were that
Andre> big.
In any case, the b
Bennett Helm wrote:
There are also focus issues, which are also issues with the dockable
TOC. Clicking on an item in the TOC causes the focus to be in the TOC
(with no cursor visible in the main document window). Typing has no
effect (because focus is in the TOC), but it is possible to insert
On Mar 13, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Bennett> Also, the "handle" of the drawer -- the small extra line in
Bennett> the middle of the outside border -- can be used to make the
Bennett> drawer bigger, but it cannot be used to close it.
I guess it is qt that controls that. In
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> FWIW, I'd also like to see toc widget narrower if possible.
Abdelrazak> I guess we need to find shorter names for "Promote" and
Abdelrazak> "Demote" then... Or we could arrange the buttons like
Abdelrazak> this:
Abdelrazak> [
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
A drawer would be nice -- if it does not change the size of the
editing window. Right now, viewing the TOC requires adjusting the
size of the window, which makes it a pain.
Abdelrazak> What do you mean
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What about the following patch?
Bennett> That works nicely as a first pass. (I'll send another .gif
Bennett> privately.) There are some oddities, such as the presence of
Bennett> a title bar (and maximize/close icons) within the draw
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:13:26PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Bennett Helm wrote:
> >On Mar 13, 2007, at 5:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>Peter> Maybe this is interesting for the mac developers/users:
> >>Peter>
> >>http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2007/03/11/new-mac-os-x-stuff-for-4
On Mar 13, 2007, at 9:45 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nice eye candy indeed. Could someone post a screenshot of 1.5 on
mac so that I can see what it looks like right now?
Bennett> The server I use is down right now; I'll e-mail you
Be
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What about the following patch?
Abdelrazak> I am just guessing here but I expect QDockWidget to be
Abdelrazak> incompatible with the Drawer property. Instead I think you
Abdelrazak> can write a simple template class using QDi
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> A drawer would be nice -- if it does not change the size of the
>> editing window. Right now, viewing the TOC requires adjusting the
>> size of the window, which makes it a pain.
Abdelrazak> What do you mean here? If you don'
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nice eye candy indeed. Could someone post a screenshot of 1.5 on
mac so that I can see what it looks like right now?
Bennett> The server I use is down right now; I'll e-mail you
Bennett> (Jean-Marc) privately a
> "Stefan" == Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> I compiled LyX with the current Qt snapshot and unified
Stefan> toolbar: http://tinyurl.com/2taqf6
Nice.
JMarc
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Mar 13, 2007, at 9:13 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Concerning the new toc widget, does qt/mac make it a drawer (is that
the term?) already, or shall we do it?
A drawer would be nice -- if it does not change the size of the
editing window. Right now, viewing the TOC requi
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Nice eye candy indeed. Could someone post a screenshot of 1.5 on
>> mac so that I can see what it looks like right now?
Bennett> The server I use is down right now; I'll e-mail you
Bennett> (Jean-Marc) privately a .gif (136K) so as no
On Mar 13, 2007, at 9:13 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Concerning the new toc widget, does qt/mac make it a drawer (is that
the term?) already, or shall we do it?
A drawer would be nice -- if it does not change the size of the
editing window. Right now, viewing the TOC requires adjusting the
I compiled LyX with the current Qt snapshot and unified toolbar:
http://tinyurl.com/2taqf6
Fonts are broken though. Everything appears in helvetica.
Schimmi
Maybe this is interesting for the mac developers/users:
http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2007/03/11/new-mac-os-x-stuff-for-43/
Peter
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Mar 13, 2007, at 5:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Peter" == Peter Kümmel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Maybe this is interesting for the mac developers/users:
Peter>
http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2007/03/11/new-mac-os-x-stuff-for-43/
Nice eye candy indeed
On Mar 13, 2007, at 5:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Maybe this is interesting for the mac developers/users:
Peter> http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2007/03/11/new-mac-os-x-
stuff-for-43/
Nice eye candy indeed. Could someone post
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Concerning the new toc widget, does qt/mac make it a drawer (is
>> that the term?) already, or shall we do it?
Abdelrazak> I have no idea what you are talking about...
Like in this picture:
http://img.hexus.net/v2/lifestyle/n
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Maybe this is interesting for the mac developers/users:
Peter> http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2007/03/11/new-mac-os-x-stuff-for-43/
Nice eye candy indeed. Could someone post a screenshot of 1.5 on mac
so th
> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Maybe this is interesting for the mac developers/users:
Peter> http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2007/03/11/new-mac-os-x-stuff-for-43/
Nice eye candy indeed. Could someone post a screenshot of 1.5 on mac
so that I can see what it look
Maybe this is interesting for the mac developers/users:
http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2007/03/11/new-mac-os-x-stuff-for-43/
Peter
59 matches
Mail list logo
