Bernhard Roider wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
FWIW, I'd also like to see toc widget narrower if possible.
Abdelrazak> I guess we need to find shorter names for "Promote" and
Abdelrazak> "Demote" then... Or we could arrange the buttons like
Abdelrazak> this:
Abdelrazak> [ Up ] [Promote][Demote] [ Down ]
Or just have four arrows?
I'd say no because I use Alt-r for Promote for example. If we can
agree to affect Tab and Shift-Tab to Promote and Demote then I would
be OK with the arroaws.
The shortcuts are a little problematic IMO. I use the cua keyboard
bindings and i am really happy with it. But it uses many shortcuts with
Alt+..., e.g. "Alt+a *" for selecting layouts. I get problems here with
the german menu shortcuts and now, if the toc dialog is docked, it also
catches the Alt+.. shortcuts from the document window. Thus it would be
good to avoid such shortcuts that come from the user interface.
Indeed... The correct solution would be to modify the cua and all other
bindings to not use any Alt-XXX shortcut because these should be
reserved to GUI accessible element (menu _and_ DockWidgets).
Of course I don't think we'll reach consensus...
For example, I really don't like the bindings for sections; "Alt+p
number" is just too long and it doesn't fit well in a French keyboard
for example. I'd really prefer Ctrl+number here.
For the general layout selection the problem is that Ctrl+p is reserved
to Print and Ctrl+l (l for layout) is reserved for latex.
But for your immediate problem, I guess you have to fix the German
translation ;-)
Abdel.
