Re: Translation of layout files

2005-06-02 Thread Michael Schmitt
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: G> IMHO, labeling them is more distinct and transparent than relying G> only on different physical layout on screen. I understand what the problem is. I just say that Labelstring is not supposed to be used for that. But for now, it will be OK. Meanwhile, I agree w

Re: Translation of layout files

2005-05-31 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "G" == G Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: G> Yes, this is what I mean with "LaTeX commands adds a label". G> Did I get you right in supposing this is "the right" use of G> LabelStrings? Yes. G> So, the next problem arises: translating of this label strings is G> handeled by babel in LaTe

Re: Translation of layout files

2005-05-31 Thread G. Milde
On 31.05.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "G" == G Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > G> On 27.05.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> > "G" == G Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I understand what the problem is. I just say that Labelstring is not > supposed to be used for that.

Re: Translation of layout files

2005-05-31 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "G" == G Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: G> On 27.05.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> > "G" == G Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> In the meantime, labelstrings help, but they are a hack. And >> really, if all they are good for is to show the Style name, we have >> a problem. G

Re: Translation of layout files

2005-05-30 Thread G. Milde
On 27.05.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "G" == G Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In the meantime, labelstrings help, but they are a hack. And really, > if all they are good for is to show the Style name, we have a problem. Open the dinbrief template, to see what I mean. E.g. there

Re: Translation of layout files

2005-05-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "G" == G Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: G> While in a normal article, most styles are distinct by their G> appearance (font, alignment, indent, ...) this is no longer the G> case for e.g. a letter or a slide-show. Yes. G> So IMHO, Label Strings are a good idea. I am not sure: if there

Re: Translation of layout files

2005-05-26 Thread G. Milde
On 26.05.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Michael" == Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Michael> JMarc, AFAICS you have introduced "LabelString"s in layout ... > Michael> The result is that the po files are flooded with "Style" > Michael> _and_ "LabelString" messages at the s

Re: Translation of layout files

2005-05-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Michael" == Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Michael> JMarc, AFAICS you have introduced "LabelString"s in layout Michael> files. E.g., Michael> Style NameRowA ... LabelString NameRowA: ... End Yes. Michael> The result is that the po files are flooded with "Style" Michael> _a

Translation of layout files

2005-05-26 Thread Michael Schmitt
JMarc, AFAICS you have introduced "LabelString"s in layout files. E.g., Style NameRowA ... LabelString NameRowA: ... End The result is that the po files are flooded with "Style" _and_ "LabelString" messages at the same time :-( Shouldn't we remove all "Style" entries fro