Re: Size of binary

2002-12-05 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:30:45AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > --disable-debug or strip the binary after compilation. which is useless for testing. Force stabs debug might help (-gstabs might do it) john -- "Trolls like content too." - Bob Abooey, /.

Re: Size of binary

2002-12-05 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hello, | | if I compile LyX 1.3.0cvs with gcc 3.2 (debug information enabled), I | get a binary > 80MB. | | I can guess the answer but is there any secret compiler switch that | minimizes the size? With a binary of that size, it is almost | impossibl

Size of binary

2002-12-05 Thread Michael Schmitt
Hello, if I compile LyX 1.3.0cvs with gcc 3.2 (debug information enabled), I get a binary > 80MB. I can guess the answer but is there any secret compiler switch that minimizes the size? With a binary of that size, it is almost impossible for me to test LyX. Regards, Michael -- ==

Re: size of binary

2000-03-29 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | egcs-1.1.2 on a DEC Alpha. Apparently (JMarc says) Alpha | binaries are big anyway and egcs produces masses of bloat. Not that much bloat, but Alpha is 64 bit and a close to doubling in binary size is to be expected. The gcc linker and compiler are ge

Re: size of binary

2000-03-29 Thread Angus Leeming
egcs-1.1.2 on a DEC Alpha. Apparently (JMarc says) Alpha binaries are big anyway and egcs produces masses of bloat. Angus > | Actually, that was the head branch of CVS, compiled without > | exceptions. Compiling the rae branch with exceptions gives > | me a slightly SMALLER unstripped binary of

Re: size of binary

2000-03-29 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Actually, that was the head branch of CVS, compiled without | exceptions. Compiling the rae branch with exceptions gives | me a slightly SMALLER unstripped binary of 28MB. Stripping | it produces a slightly larger 3.1MB. What compiler and os did you sa

Re: size of binary

2000-03-29 Thread Angus Leeming
Angus> Hi all, I've just noticed the size of the binary of lyx-cvs: Angus> -rwxr-xr-x 1 aleem users 32768000 Mar 27 11:36 src/lyx* Angus> That's 32MB! JMarc> I get only: JMarc> -rwxr--r-- 1 lasgoutt meval11968512 Mar 21 15:59 lyx JMarc> But that's because I do not use the new-and-improved

Re: size of binary

2000-03-28 Thread Allan Rae
On 27 Mar 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> Hi all, I've just noticed the size of the binary of lyx-cvs: > Angus> -rwxr-xr-x 1 aleem users 32768000 Mar 27 11:36 src/lyx* > > Angus> That's 32MB! > > I get only: > -rwxr--r--

Re: size of binary

2000-03-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Hi all, I've just noticed the size of the binary of lyx-cvs: Angus> -rwxr-xr-x 1 aleem users 32768000 Mar 27 11:36 src/lyx* Angus> That's 32MB! I get only: -rwxr--r-- 1 lasgoutt meval11968512 Mar 21 15:59 lyx But that's be

Re: size of binary

2000-03-27 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 11:38:45AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just noticed the size of the binary of lyx-cvs: > -rwxr-xr-x 1 aleemusers32768000 Mar 27 11:36 src/lyx* > > That's 32MB! > > Stripping it: > -rwxr-xr-x 1 aleemusers2473984 Mar 27 11:37 src/lyx

size of binary

2000-03-27 Thread Angus Leeming
Hi all, I've just noticed the size of the binary of lyx-cvs: -rwxr-xr-x 1 aleemusers32768000 Mar 27 11:36 src/lyx* That's 32MB! Stripping it: -rwxr-xr-x 1 aleemusers2473984 Mar 27 11:37 src/lyx* That's 2.5MB. Are these figues representative?? I'm using gcc version egcs-2.