Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
My testing has made it seem pretty intuitive to me. You're typing
along, you get a completion suggested, and you hit Tab. If no
completion is being suggested, then Tab takes you to the next cell.
Now, for sure, the details here de
rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My testing has made it seem pretty intuitive to me. You're typing
> along, you get a completion suggested, and you hit Tab. If no
> completion is being suggested, then Tab takes you to the next cell.
> Now, for sure, the details here depend upon exactly which LF
José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 23 September 2008 20:08:40 Pavel Sanda wrote:
José Matos wrote:
I doubt the multi-LFUN binding will be sorted out by then. But maybe
that's OK.
Is it worth to wait for it? (This is an honest question.) :-)
yes
How many days? Is anoth
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Well, right now, there's no binding for the completion stuff, which
means that user's will have a hard time using it, which means we
might not get the testing we want.
Note that the patch you sent solves this particular problem, so
applying it would be enough for n
Well, right now, there's no binding for the completion stuff,
which means that user's will have a hard time using it, which
means we might not get the testing we want.
Note that the patch you sent solves this particular problem, so
applying it would be enough for now.
BTW, which lfun take
On Tuesday 23 September 2008 20:26:03 Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> if we are not able to solve it to another week, be harsh to us :)
Fair enough. In one week rc3 will be released not matter what is the state of
this feature. Is this OK? ;-)
> pavel
--
José Abílio
José Matos wrote:
> > > Is it worth to wait for it? (This is an honest question.) :-)
> >
> > yes
>
> How many days? Is another week enough?
> I don't want to hold the release hostage of a given (mis)feature.
if we are not able to solve it to another week, be harsh to us :)
pavel
On Tuesday 23 September 2008 20:08:40 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> José Matos wrote:
> > > I doubt the multi-LFUN binding will be sorted out by then. But maybe
> > > that's OK.
> >
> > Is it worth to wait for it? (This is an honest question.) :-)
>
> yes
How many days? Is another week enough?
I don't want
José Matos wrote:
> > I doubt the multi-LFUN binding will be sorted out by then. But maybe
> > that's OK.
>
> Is it worth to wait for it? (This is an honest question.) :-)
yes
pavel
José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 23 September 2008 16:52:41 rgheck wrote:
I doubt the multi-LFUN binding will be sorted out by then. But maybe
that's OK.
Is it worth to wait for it? (This is an honest question.) :-)
Well, right now, there's no binding for the completion stuff, which
m
On Tuesday 23 September 2008 16:52:41 rgheck wrote:
> I doubt the multi-LFUN binding will be sorted out by then. But maybe
> that's OK.
Is it worth to wait for it? (This is an honest question.) :-)
How much time will it take for a proper solution to appear? I have been
following your discussion
José Matos wrote:
Hi,
after the previous warning I think that we are ready to release rc3. I intend
to tag the source in two days.
This should be enough to finish work that is ongoing.
I doubt the multi-LFUN binding will be sorted out by then. But maybe
that's OK.
rh
Hi,
after the previous warning I think that we are ready to release rc3. I
intend
to tag the source in two days.
This should be enough to finish work that is ongoing.
As it has been usual in the previous releases I will mark a candidate
with
the respective svn version
13 matches
Mail list logo
