On 30-Nov-2001 Rainer Dorsch wrote:
>> Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | I have the impression that these bugs are xform problems to a large
>> | extend and
>>
>> I belive that this impression is wrong.
>>
>
> The students claim that lyx is much more stable when used under fv
> You'd need to be moer specific. What sort of things are they doing when it
> crashes (resizing windows, clicking on menus, what ?).
Unfortunately, they haven't shown me something reproduceabel. But I have seen
the crashes myself... I will ask for more details reports.
> There is a small possi
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 06:51:49PM +0100, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> The students claim that lyx is much more stable when used under fvwm and not
> under KDE2. Wouldn't that mean that the interaction with xforms could be a
> weak?
You'd need to be moer specific. What sort of things are they doing
> Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I have the impression that these bugs are xform problems to a large
> | extend and
>
> I belive that this impression is wrong.
>
The students claim that lyx is much more stable when used under fvwm and not
under KDE2. Wouldn't that mean that
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Hello,
Hello.
[...]
> therefore I am looking forward to see a GTK- or QT-version of lyx. I am very
> happy about the GUI-I, but at the same time, it is progressing very slowly. To
> my understanding
>
> - currently a large part is ported to GUI-I
> -
