On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 11:40:56AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:56:31PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 12:37:16PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > as stated in title, the spellcheck suggestions are not added to the
> > > context
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:56:31PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 12:37:16PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > as stated in title, the spellcheck suggestions are not added to the context
> > menu
> > for the misspelled word as is the case in usual text. You have t
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 12:37:16PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as stated in title, the spellcheck suggestions are not added to the context
> menu
> for the misspelled word as is the case in usual text. You have to be in the
> 'Frame title' inset you usually see in Frame environment.
>
>
Stephan Witt writes:
>> I do not have time to test it, so I'll just make comments. Does it
>> actually go faster, btw?
>
> Thanks for comments. Yes it is faster. On my macbook the latency on
> page-up/down is gone for mostly correct text.
That is very good. And there is potential for improvement.
Am 11.08.2010 um 22:33 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 11 août 10 à 21:21, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>> I've prepared the following patch to demonstrate the way to speed up the
>> native spell checker on mac. In case of spell error it is as slow as the
>> original version. I'd like to improve th
Le 11 août 10 à 23:47, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Please don't introduce Row.h dependency into Paragraph. The first is
about screen and the second about contents.
Just make a new Paragraph::spellCheckRange(ps_type from, pos_type to)
And I agree with JMarc that this method is too complicated a
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've prepared the following patch to demonstrate the way to speed up the
> native spell checker on mac. In case of spell error it is as slow as the
> original version. I'd like to improve that next...
>
Please don't introduce Row.h d
Le 11 août 10 à 21:21, Stephan Witt a écrit :
I've prepared the following patch to demonstrate the way to speed up
the native spell checker on mac. In case of spell error it is as
slow as the original version. I'd like to improve that next...
I do not have time to test it, so I'll just make
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 08:52:09PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hi,
> Can you please report this as LyX bug?
Done:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6708
Sven
--
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
[The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]
Am 20.05.2010 20:28, schrieb Sven Hoexter:
I don't see this (and I cannot imagine what could have caused this). Could you
post a test file?
Sure see the attached german one.
Round one:
Catches "Deis", correct it to "Dies", next word detected is "eni".
Now I can reproduce it too. It only occ
On 11/22/2009 03:00 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Samstag 21 November 2009 schrieb rgheck:
On 11/21/2009 05:31 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 20/11/2009 23:52, rgheck a écrit :
checking hunspell/hunspell.hxx usability... yes
checking hunspell/hunspell.hxx presence... yes
che
Am Samstag 21 November 2009 schrieb rgheck:
> On 11/21/2009 05:31 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 20/11/2009 23:52, rgheck a écrit :
> >> checking hunspell/hunspell.hxx usability... yes
> >> checking hunspell/hunspell.hxx presence... yes
> >> checking for hunspell/hunspell.hxx... yes
> >> ch
On 11/21/2009 11:25 AM, rgheck wrote:
On 11/21/2009 05:31 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 20/11/2009 23:52, rgheck a écrit :
checking hunspell/hunspell.hxx usability... yes
checking hunspell/hunspell.hxx presence... yes
checking for hunspell/hunspell.hxx... yes
checking for main in -lhunspel
On 11/21/2009 05:31 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 20/11/2009 23:52, rgheck a écrit :
checking hunspell/hunspell.hxx usability... yes
checking hunspell/hunspell.hxx presence... yes
checking for hunspell/hunspell.hxx... yes
checking for main in -lhunspell... no
checking whether to use hunspel
Le 20/11/2009 23:52, rgheck a écrit :
checking hunspell/hunspell.hxx usability... yes
checking hunspell/hunspell.hxx presence... yes
checking for hunspell/hunspell.hxx... yes
checking for main in -lhunspell... no
checking whether to use hunspell... no
Could you show us the relevant parts of con
Kornel Benko wrote:
Hi Abdel,
spellchecking with aspel shows big differencies between trunk and branch.
In branch is seems to work flawlessly. In trunk it seems to stop very
early, the last part of
a bigger lyx-file seems to be not checked.
If I change a word I see immediately the now underli
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> for holidays for two weeks starting tomorrow.
enjoy! :)
pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
if it's easy to add "replace all" to the spellcheck dialog you would
make at least 1 person very happy ;-)
Turned out to be quite easy so I just added the button. Please test.
btw we might want new toolbar icon for c
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
if it's easy to add "replace all" to the spellcheck dialog you would
make at least 1 person very happy ;-)
>>> Turned out to be quite easy so I just added the button. Please test.
btw we might want new toolbar icon for continuous spellcheck?
pa
On 09/07/2009 21:33, Edwin Leuven wrote:
Abdel wrote:
On 23/06/2009 11:18, Edwin Leuven wrote:
if it's easy to add "replace all" to the spellcheck dialog you would make at
least 1 person very happy ;-)
Turned out to be quite easy so I just added the button. Please test.
Abdel wrote:
> On 23/06/2009 11:18, Edwin Leuven wrote:
>> if it's easy to add "replace all" to the spellcheck dialog you would make at
>> least 1 person very happy ;-)
>>
> Turned out to be quite easy so I just added the button. Please test.
thanks! seems to work like a charm :-)
the only litt
On 23/06/2009 11:18, Edwin Leuven wrote:
hi abdel,
since you're digging around in the spellcheck code:
if it's easy to add "replace all" to the spellcheck dialog you would make at
least 1 person very happy ;-)
Turned out to be quite easy so I just added the button. Please test.
Abdel.
Steve Litt wrote:
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 05:21:28 am Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
hi abdel,
since you're digging around in the spellcheck code:
if it's easy to add "replace all" to the spellcheck dialog you would make
at least 1 person very happy ;-)
Yes, I al
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 05:21:28 am Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > hi abdel,
> >
> > since you're digging around in the spellcheck code:
> >
> > if it's easy to add "replace all" to the spellcheck dialog you would make
> > at least 1 person very happy ;-)
>
> Yes, I already thou
Edwin Leuven wrote:
hi abdel,
since you're digging around in the spellcheck code:
if it's easy to add "replace all" to the spellcheck dialog you would make at
least 1 person very happy ;-)
Yes, I already thought about the very same feature ;-)
I'll try to if I manage to find enough time
pavel wrote:
> for the time being i have commited your patch.
thanks
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> You should use as username tour @lyx.org login name. And you need to
> > send a password to Lars so that he activates your account.
>
> mm, i think i did both ... but now i start to have some doubts
>
> lars can u confirm that my account is active?
for the time being i hav
jmarc wrote:
> You should use as username tour @lyx.org login name. And you need to
> send a password to Lars so that he activates your account.
mm, i think i did both ... but now i start to have some doubts
lars can u confirm that my account is active?
ed.
Edwin Leuven writes:
> doing svn commit gives me
>
> svn: Commit failed (details follow):
> svn: Authentication error from server: Username not found
You should use as username tour @lyx.org login name. And you need to
send a password to Lars so that he activates your account.
JMarc
pavel wrote:
> you need to
> svn switch --relocate svn+ssh://lar...@svn.lyx.org/lyx/...
> svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/...
>
> for your tree or checkout the fresh archive (now without the '+ssh' prefix
> in protocol). first commit you will be asked for user and pass you had
> previsouly and from then s
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> the attached fixes some typos in the spellcheck code
>
> i can't seem to commit, perhaps someone can do it for me?
you need to
svn switch --relocate svn+ssh://lar...@svn.lyx.org/lyx/...
svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/...
for your tree or checkout the fresh archive (now without the
On Friday 20 April 2007 12:17:28 pm Edwin Leuven wrote:
> i moved the spellchecker to the main toolbar (am sure everybody agrees)
> but forgot to remove it from the extra one
>
> ok to commit?
OK.
--
José Abílio
Darren Freeman wrote:
> Re-posted since this is a regression from 1.2.1 as far as my machine goes.
>
> No cause was found AFAIK. No solution, probably had something to do with
> xforms doing something bizarre.
>
> I'm using xforms 0.89 I believe, since 1.0RC5 wouldn't build for me last
> time I
Re-posted since this is a regression from 1.2.1 as far as my machine goes.
No cause was found AFAIK. No solution, probably had something to do with
xforms doing something bizarre.
I'm using xforms 0.89 I believe, since 1.0RC5 wouldn't build for me last time
I tried.
--8<--8<-
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 22:31, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Sorry dude =)
> >
> > Keep trying!
>
> No, I'm giving up. I think that your xforms library is not behaving as it
> should. Line 225ff of slider.c:
> Since I don't see any such nonsense, I conclude that the problem is at your
> end.
OK. Wel
> Sorry dude =)
>
> Keep trying!
No, I'm giving up. I think that your xforms library is not behaving as it
should. Line 225ff of slider.c:
if (ob->align == FL_ALIGN_CENTER)
{
fl_drw_slider(ob->boxtype, sp->x, sp->y, sp->w, sp->h,
ob->col
I found that by commenting lines in FormSpellchecker.C that I couldn't
affect one label and not the other. It seems that code elsewhere is
reading the label from the form and writing it two different ways.
I don't know enough to help right now =(
Have fun,
Darren
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 23:33, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Sunday 24 November 2002 11:27 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > Still corrupted text - probably a font issue. It seems to print the
> > percentage twice, once in the desired font and again much smaller and
> > off to the right a little bit, thus th
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 23:33, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Still corrupted text - probably a font issue. It seems to print the
> > percentage twice, once in the desired font and again much smaller and
> > off to the right a little bit, thus the small version overwrites the %
> > sign of the bigger versi
On Sunday 24 November 2002 11:27 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 02:12, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > On Thursday 14 November 2002 3:36 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > > Dear list,
> > >
> > > the spelchecker status bar is still corrupted. Attached is a screenshot
> > > at 100%. When I l
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 12:45:02PM +1030, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > It isn't a word count
>
> Then why does it say "Word count"?
Because that's a (ui) bug.
> And why does it correctly count the number of words checked when it
> reaches the end of the document?
Unrelated...
The progress bar ca
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 10:22, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 09:57:13AM +1030, Darren Freeman wrote:
>
> > Not only that but now the word count doesn't increment. I tested with a
> > single line of jibberish, the word count stayed on 0 until all was
> > completed.
>
> It isn't a word
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 09:57:13AM +1030, Darren Freeman wrote:
> Not only that but now the word count doesn't increment. I tested with a
> single line of jibberish, the word count stayed on 0 until all was
> completed.
It isn't a word count
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law: If the same point is m
On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 02:12, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Thursday 14 November 2002 3:36 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > the spelchecker status bar is still corrupted. Attached is a screenshot
> > at 100%. When I looked at it glosely in GIMP I realised that the weird
> > characters ar
On Thursday 14 November 2002 3:36 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> the spelchecker status bar is still corrupted. Attached is a screenshot
> at 100%. When I looked at it glosely in GIMP I realised that the weird
> characters are actually two copies of 100% on top of each other, one
> norm
Angus Leeming wrote:
On Thursday 14 November 2002 3:36 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
Dear list,
When spellchecking, a double click of the desired suggestion replaces
the word and moves to the next possible error, as it should. But the
text in the dialogue doesn't update, it still refers to the prev
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 02:06:50AM +1030, Darren Freeman wrote:
> When spellchecking, a double click of the desired suggestion replaces
> the word and moves to the next possible error, as it should. But the
> text in the dialogue doesn't update, it still refers to the previous
> error.
works fine
On Thursday 14 November 2002 3:36 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> When spellchecking, a double click of the desired suggestion replaces
> the word and moves to the next possible error, as it should. But the
> text in the dialogue doesn't update, it still refers to the previous
> error.
On Sunday 03 November 2002 6:00 am, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Darren Freeman wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 03:44, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> >>Darren Freeman wrote:
> >>>I just ran a spellcheck and noticed that when it hit 100% that it
> >>>actually has some garbage characters between 100 and %.
> >>
> >>Is
Darren Freeman wrote:
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 03:44, Rob Lahaye wrote:
Darren Freeman wrote:
I just ran a spellcheck and noticed that when it hit 100% that it
actually has some garbage characters between 100 and %.
Is that Qt or Xforms frontend?
Xforms
If it's Xforms, I'm very much curious
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 03:44, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Darren Freeman wrote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > I just ran a spellcheck and noticed that when it hit 100% that it
> > actually has some garbage characters between 100 and %.
>
> Is that Qt or Xforms frontend?
Xforms
> If it's Xforms, I'm very much c
Darren Freeman wrote:
Dear list,
I just ran a spellcheck and noticed that when it hit 100% that it
actually has some garbage characters between 100 and %.
Is that Qt or Xforms frontend?
If it's Xforms, I'm very much curious, since my Spellcheck
dialog patch went in recently. Since when did you
52 matches
Mail list logo
