Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-11 Thread Allan Rae
On 11 Feb 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | When I instead use: > | cvs update -j HEAD > > What does the cvs manual say about this? > Perhaps HEAD is not a good tag to merge against. The manual gives all its examples as merging a branch into the tr

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> Lars> | Could you change that? I can do | it too, but since Lars> you're | Lars> working on the

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> | Could you change that? I can do | it too, but since you're | Lars> working on the code... | | Lars> It seems that you already did this... | | Yes, too much free time i

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> | Could you change that? I can do | it too, but since you're Lars> working on the code... Lars> It seems that you already did this... Yes, too much free time in my hands. JMarc

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars, dec cxx does not like the fact that methods like Painter::arc | return Painter& and not PainterBase&. Dec cxx is not following the C++ standard in this respect. (But we already knew that...) | Could you change that? I can do | it too, but

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> I have a fixed the outstanding issues with the new painter (I Lars> only need to get my laptop on net so that I can commit). After I Lars> have commited those changes I will make the new Painter the Lars> default and begin to r

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars> Allan> While I'm on the subject while is acinclude.m4 in the | Lars> Allan> repository? We build it with autogen.sh and noone should Lars> be | Allan> editting it anyway.

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Allan> While I'm on the subject while is acinclude.m4 in the | Allan> repository? We build it with autogen.sh and noone should be | Allan> editting it anyway. Is this just that someone forgot to do a: | Allan> cvs rm acinclude? | | We could remo

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | While I'm on the subject while is acinclude.m4 in the repository? We | build it with autogen.sh and noone should be editting it anyway. Is this | just that someone forgot to do a: cvs rm acinclude? No, I had a (at the time) good reason to not remove it

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 10 Feb 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | You should maybe update the rae branch wrt the main one. It will be | > | more painful if you wait too much. | > | > Very true. | | Now that cvs

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Allan> On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Allan Rae wrote: >> You're a developer! You have autoconf and automake installed why >> not libtool as well? I think Lars has been been spoiling you. >> >> Why do we need libtool in the repository? Sure it's got t

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-10 Thread Allan Rae
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Allan Rae wrote: > You're a developer! You have autoconf and automake installed why not > libtool as well? I think Lars has been been spoiling you. > > Why do we need libtool in the repository? Sure it's got to be included in > the dist but it doesn't need to be in the rep

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> I would like to see this code it would interst me what you Juergen> did to call KDE_DO_IT_ALL only if the --with-frontend=kde is Juergen> set. >> OTOH, I am concerned by the fact that this KDE autoconf stuff does >> many thing

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-10 Thread Allan Rae
On 9 Feb 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Allan> On 8 Feb 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> I did not get far. First problem: ./autogen.sh gives the following > >> warnings/errors: > >> > >> fantomas: ./autogen.sh Locating GNU m

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-10 Thread Allan Rae
On 10 Feb 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | You should maybe update the rae branch wrt the main one. It will be > | more painful if you wait too much. > > Very true. Now that cvs is working again I will be able to. > So you should decid

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> I have a Problem now for the configuration of the frontend Juergen> and I probably need your help Jean-Marc to solve it. I Juergen> thought (wrongly) that if I have code like this: Juergen> if test ; then Juergen> do this Ju

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> On 09-Feb-2000 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Are you refering to the code in LYX_USE_FRONTEND? It looks good to >> me. However, it still does not work... The code for KDE_DO_IT_ALL >> is inserted before the code of LYX_USE_FR

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | You should maybe update the rae branch wrt the main one. It will be | more painful if you wait too much. Very true. I have now the new painter,workarea and lcolor pending inclusion into the main branch. There is a log if #ifdef'ed code there t

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Allan> On 8 Feb 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> I did not get far. First problem: ./autogen.sh gives the following >> warnings/errors: >> >> fantomas: ./autogen.sh Locating GNU m4... found: gm4 Generate >> acinclude.m4... done. Building

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-09 Thread Allan Rae
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Allan Rae wrote: > On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > > Allan> Actually I don't even see the --with-frontend option listed > > > Allan> when I try ./configure --help. Something funny going on here. > > > > > > Did you run autogen.sh? > > > > I guess Jean-Marc is

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-09 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > Allan> Actually I don't even see the --with-frontend option listed > > Allan> when I try ./configure --help. Something funny going on here. > > > > Did you run autogen.sh? > > I guess Jean-Marc is right here and you probably have to update you > sourc

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-09 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 09-Feb-2000 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Juergen> That's exactly the problem I would have like you to answer :) > Juergen> I've no idea why the code is inserted before! > > I have done some small changes to your code (that I cannot commit nor > test, unfortunately), but it seems it should b

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-09 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 09-Feb-2000 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Are you refering to the code in LYX_USE_FRONTEND? It looks good to me. > However, it still does not work... The code for KDE_DO_IT_ALL is > inserted before the code of LYX_USE_FRONTEND, and I do not know why. > Maybe a problem with kde.m4. > That'

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-09 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 09-Feb-2000 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Allan> On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Allan Rae wrote: >>> > Second problem: configure dies with > checking for Qt... >>> configure: error: Qt-1.4 (headers and libraries) > not found. >>> Please check you

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Allan> On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Allan Rae wrote: >> > Second problem: configure dies with > checking for Qt... >> configure: error: Qt-1.4 (headers and libraries) > not found. >> Please check your installation! > > I indeed do not have Qt >> insta

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-08 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Allan Rae wrote: > > Second problem: configure dies with > > checking for Qt... configure: error: Qt-1.4 (headers and libraries) > > not found. Please check your installation! > > > > I indeed do not have Qt installed, but I shouldn't need to, right? > > I blame Juergen ;-)

Re: rae branch compile woes.

2000-02-08 Thread Allan Rae
On 8 Feb 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I did not get far. First problem: ./autogen.sh gives the following > warnings/errors: > > fantomas: ./autogen.sh > Locating GNU m4... found: gm4 > Generate acinclude.m4... done. > Building macros... aclocal: configure.in: 101: macro > `AM_DISABLE_SHAR