José Matos wrote:
> I suspect that these problems are specific of the kernels between 2.6.29
> (28?)
> and 2.6.31 when using ext4. This is what I remember but I admit to be wrong.
to repeat my question again. are you able to reproduce .lyx dataloss with
lyx 1.6.4 on you current kernel?
pavel
On Friday 28 January 2011 15:54:06 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> are you able to test current status? months ago i had private discussion
> with one kernel dev, who claimed those issues got fixed by added
> heuristics in 2.6.31 but the anonymous in #6587 claimed that
> 2.6.31-19-generic-#56-Ubuntu still sho
José Matos wrote:
> On Friday 28 January 2011 13:51:17 Richard Heck wrote:
> > I have ext4. Just tell me what to do.
> >
> > rh
>
> The last time I had this kind of problem with ext4 was in 2009 (with Fedora
> 10/11), the culprit was the kernel. Currently this class of bugs should be
> fixed in
On Friday 28 January 2011 13:51:17 Richard Heck wrote:
> I have ext4. Just tell me what to do.
>
> rh
The last time I had this kind of problem with ext4 was in 2009 (with Fedora
10/11), the culprit was the kernel. Currently this class of bugs should be
fixed in ext4.
In any case it never hurts
Richard Heck wrote:
> On 01/28/2011 07:39 AM, sa...@lyx.org wrote:
>> Author: sanda
>> Date: Fri Jan 28 13:39:50 2011
>> New Revision: 37348
>> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/37348
>>
>> Log:
>> .lyx as symlinks killed when saving because of #6587 workarounds.
>>
>> At the end escape for fs
On 01/28/2011 07:39 AM, sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: sanda
Date: Fri Jan 28 13:39:50 2011
New Revision: 37348
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/37348
Log:
.lyx as symlinks killed when saving because of #6587 workarounds.
At the end escape for fsync would be the least hackish solution
but i
