On 7/15/2010 12:39 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
separating them is probably better idea. btw Joost are you able to reproduce
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6818 on your system?
Yes, I can reproduce.
I'm compiling a debug version.
Joost
Joost Verburg wrote:
> On 7/9/2010 1:33 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> it seem quite unprobable but why not, trunk dir above does not cost
>> anything.
>
> How should we proceed with the new dictionaries module? Are all the
> dictionaries and thesaurus lists going into dictionaries/trunk or should
>
Am 15.07.2010 um 18:30 schrieb Joost Verburg:
> On 7/9/2010 1:33 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> it seem quite unprobable but why not, trunk dir above does not cost anything.
>
> How should we proceed with the new dictionaries module? Are all the
> dictionaries and thesaurus lists going into dictionar
On 7/9/2010 1:33 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
it seem quite unprobable but why not, trunk dir above does not cost anything.
How should we proceed with the new dictionaries module? Are all the
dictionaries and thesaurus lists going into dictionaries/trunk or should
there be two subdirectories like d
Joost Verburg wrote:
> I was talking about the packaging. The source would be the SVN repository.
> Automatic zipping is a good idea!
i've created standardsvn structure there, so put all the stuff you had in mind
into svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/dictionaries/trunk
pavel
On 7/9/2010 1:31 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
thats up to you. but bundling is pretty orthogonal to the current svn activity.
my plan was write trivial makefile which will just zip all files into one
archive
which we put on ftp. that would be the reference point for partricular lyx
versions...
i have
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 09.07.2010 um 17:12 schrieb Joost Verburg:
>
> > On 7/9/2010 8:25 AM, Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote:
> >> The repository is created. I guess you should create a trunk/ branches/
> >> structure in it.
> >
> > I don't think we need different branches for dictionaries.
> > Perh
Joost Verburg wrote:
> On 7/9/2010 11:27 AM, Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote:
>> Are we sure that file formats are not going to evolve? Do we plan
>> eventually to allow users to download these dictionaries on the fly?
>
> Maybe thes/mythes2/ and dicts/hunspell1/ ?
looks fine.
> I'm thinking about jus
Am 09.07.2010 um 17:12 schrieb Joost Verburg:
> On 7/9/2010 8:25 AM, Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote:
>> The repository is created. I guess you should create a trunk/ branches/
>> structure in it.
>
> I don't think we need different branches for dictionaries.
> Perhaps the structure could be dicts/ th
On 7/9/2010 11:27 AM, Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote:
Are we sure that file formats are not going to evolve? Do we plan
eventually to allow users to download these dictionaries on the fly?
Maybe thes/mythes2/ and dicts/hunspell1/ ?
I'm thinking about just bundling all of them. There have been many
Joost Verburg writes:
> On 7/9/2010 8:25 AM, Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote:
>> The repository is created. I guess you should create a trunk/ branches/
>> structure in it.
>
> I don't think we need different branches for dictionaries.
> Perhaps the structure could be dicts/ thes/ ?
Are we sure that
On 7/9/2010 8:25 AM, Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote:
The repository is created. I guess you should create a trunk/ branches/
structure in it.
I don't think we need different branches for dictionaries.
Perhaps the structure could be dicts/ thes/ ?
Joost
Pavel Sanda writes:
> svn mkdir accepts url...
> but when i tried svn mkdir svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/dictionaries
> i got
> svn: Access denied
> svn: Your commit message was left in a temporary file:
> svn:'svn-commit.tmp'
>
> maybe you have more privileges?
No, but I have enough sudo privilege
Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote:
> Pavel Sanda writes:
> > Joost Verburg wrote:
> >> On 7/8/2010 6:52 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >>> yes, fine. will you do it?
> >>> pavel
> >>
> >> You want to create a new SVN module, right?
> >> It's probably better if you do this.
> >
> > yes. thinking more about it m
Am 09.07.2010 um 10:13 schrieb Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES:
> Pavel Sanda writes:
>> Joost Verburg wrote:
>>> On 7/8/2010 6:52 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
yes, fine. will you do it?
pavel
>>>
>>> You want to create a new SVN module, right?
>>> It's probably better if you do this.
>>
>> yes. thin
Pavel Sanda writes:
> Joost Verburg wrote:
>> On 7/8/2010 6:52 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>> yes, fine. will you do it?
>>> pavel
>>
>> You want to create a new SVN module, right?
>> It's probably better if you do this.
>
> yes. thinking more about it maybe only JMarc who
> has the privileges to do i
Joost Verburg wrote:
> On 7/8/2010 6:52 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> yes, fine. will you do it?
>> pavel
>
> You want to create a new SVN module, right?
> It's probably better if you do this.
yes. thinking more about it maybe only JMarc who
has the privileges to do it?
pavel
On 7/8/2010 6:52 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
yes, fine. will you do it?
pavel
You want to create a new SVN module, right?
It's probably better if you do this.
Joost
Joost Verburg wrote:
> On 7/8/2010 6:20 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> ok lets do this. i would crete new svn module dictionaries and put
>> them into "dictionaries/openoffice/thesaurus". opinions?
>
> I'm not sure we will get all dictionaries/thesauri from OpenOffice
> extensions. Sometimes there are
On 7/8/2010 6:20 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
ok lets do this. i would crete new svn module dictionaries and put
them into "dictionaries/openoffice/thesaurus". opinions?
I'm not sure we will get all dictionaries/thesauri from OpenOffice
extensions. Sometimes there are more recent version available e
Stephan Witt wrote:
> So currently I would package the openoffice thesauri and be done with it.
ok lets do this. i would crete new svn module dictionaries and put
them into "dictionaries/openoffice/thesaurus". opinions?
pavel
For Aspell it's another story - on Mac OS you can get them from
macports and 2.0 LyX
will find and use them. So we don't have to distribute them. Of
course for the natively
supported languages Aspell or hunspell isn't needed at all.
Additionally the user has the
option to extend the native s
On 7/7/2010 1:36 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
The dictionaries for hunspell and the thesauri are openoffice work.
AFAIK there many different open source projects that maintain
dictionaries for a certain language and they are usually the ones who
create the OpenOffice extensions and submit them for
Am 07.07.2010 um 14:43 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> i hope i understand correctly that dictionary files themselves are identical
>>> to all platforms (while the code around is not). so i would put all the code
>>> into our tarball, while the dictionaries could be packed separatel
Stephan Witt wrote:
> > i hope i understand correctly that dictionary files themselves are identical
> > to all platforms (while the code around is not). so i would put all the code
> > into our tarball, while the dictionaries could be packed separately - we can
> > even create new svn directory on
Am 07.07.2010 um 10:35 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 06.07.2010 um 23:51 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>>
>>> Stephan Witt wrote:
Yes. But I don't know if this is enough and legal. Is anybody able to tell
this for sure?
E. g. the spanish language pack contains a README w
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 06.07.2010 um 23:51 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>
> > Stephan Witt wrote:
> >> Yes. But I don't know if this is enough and legal. Is anybody able to tell
> >> this for sure?
> >> E. g. the spanish language pack contains a README with a reference to
> >> http://www.gnu.org/licen
Am 06.07.2010 um 23:51 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Yes. But I don't know if this is enough and legal. Is anybody able to tell
>> this for sure?
>> E. g. the spanish language pack contains a README with a reference to
>> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.txt.
>> As I understand i
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Yes. But I don't know if this is enough and legal. Is anybody able to tell
> this for sure?
> E. g. the spanish language pack contains a README with a reference to
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.txt.
> As I understand it we are allowed to use it but we have to ...
> "giv
On 7/4/2010 1:04 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
So I'm really baffled that the mythes code in LyX can deal with the old file format. The
parser starts unconditionally with reading first line as encoding, second line as no. of
lines and allocates 0 index entries (because of converting "Alá,24" results
Am 04.07.2010 um 17:15 schrieb Joost Verburg:
> On 7/4/2010 9:16 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Hmm... then I have to check again why it crashed here.
>> While studying the code I was not surprised about the crash.
>> OTOH the version 2 files are available. Perhaps one can decide to use them
>> anywa
On 7/4/2010 9:16 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Hmm... then I have to check again why it crashed here.
While studying the code I was not surprised about the crash.
OTOH the version 2 files are available. Perhaps one can decide to use them
anyway.
Where did you find the v2 files?
It could be that the
Am 03.07.2010 um 23:32 schrieb Joost Verburg:
> On 7/3/2010 5:18 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Do you made the collection manually? I noticed some outdated files in it.
>> Mythes needs the version 2 thesaurus files. They are named like "th*_v2.idx"
>> etc.
>> E. g. the spanish and french thesaurus i
On 7/3/2010 5:18 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Do you made the collection manually? I noticed some outdated files in it.
Mythes needs the version 2 thesaurus files. They are named like "th*_v2.idx"
etc.
E. g. the spanish and french thesaurus in your zip file is not usable therefore.
I think we have t
Stephan Witt wrote:
> No, I haven't. So we can move the check one level up - to Thesaurus.cpp?
> Would this be ok with you? (patch attached)
Yes.
Jürgen
Am 03.07.2010 um 14:44 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> I tried to incorporate some thesaurus files from OpenOffice. It seems like
>> the file format has changed and is incompatible now. So the old thesaurus
>> .idx and .dat files are found but not valid and then LyX crashes. T
Stephan Witt wrote:
> I tried to incorporate some thesaurus files from OpenOffice. It seems like
> the file format has changed and is incompatible now. So the old thesaurus
> .idx and .dat files are found but not valid and then LyX crashes. To avoid
> this I added the checks above.
I suppose you h
Am 03.07.2010 um 00:45 schrieb Joost Verburg:
> On 7/2/2010 3:37 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> I tried to incorporate some thesaurus files from OpenOffice. It seems like
>> the file format has changed and is incompatible now. So the old thesaurus
>> .idx and .dat files are found but not valid and t
On 7/2/2010 3:37 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
I tried to incorporate some thesaurus files from OpenOffice. It seems like the
file format has changed and is incompatible now. So the old thesaurus .idx and
.dat files are found but not valid and then LyX crashes. To avoid this I added
the checks above
Am 02.07.2010 um 10:16 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> I tried to incorporate some thesaurus files from OpenOffice. It seems like
>> the file format has changed and is incompatible now. So the old thesaurus
>> .idx and .dat files are found but not valid and then LyX crashes. To avo
Stephan Witt wrote:
> I tried to incorporate some thesaurus files from OpenOffice. It seems like
> the file format has changed and is incompatible now. So the old thesaurus
> .idx and .dat files are found but not valid and then LyX crashes. To avoid
> this I added the checks above.
> But the que
Am 02.07.2010 um 09:03 schrieb sw...@lyx.org:
> Author: switt
> Date: Fri Jul 2 09:03:15 2010
> New Revision: 34742
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34742
>
> Log:
> add checks for empty word list to avoid crashes later in MyThes::binsearch()
>
> Modified:
> lyx-devel/trunk/src/suppor
42 matches
Mail list logo
