On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Allan Rae wrote:
[...]
> Again, I see no need for lyx.pot or POTFILES* to be in CVS. Please
> enlighten me if I've missed something.
>
> (Although as I said in my last email srcdir!=builddir is now getting
> to be a problem because the generated form_*.[Ch] files are in
> bui
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | They don't need to make a dist. Translaters are usually asked to
>> | download a prelease (ie. a dist) and provide updated translations from
>> | that. So th
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | They don't need to make a dist. Translaters are usually asked to
> | download a prelease (ie. a dist) and provide updated translations from
> | that. So the dist is the only place we need to ensure we h
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| They don't need to make a dist. Translaters are usually asked to
| download a prelease (ie. a dist) and provide updated translations from
| that. So the dist is the only place we need to ensure we have a
| correct copy of POTFILES* and lyx.pot (no need fo
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >
> >> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> >> | _Or_ not have it in CVS.
> >>
> >> That is the worst option since we will have a _very_ hard time
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| [...]
>> >> So the solution is either to make all generations of this document to
>> >> use the same sorting
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[...]
> >> So the solution is either to make all generations of this document to
> >> use the same sorting rules, _or_ to not have this file automatically
>
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 12:49:43AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> >> | It changes all the time. Every build it seems to be different. It's
>> >> |
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 12:49:43AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> | It changes all the time. Every build it seems to be different. It's
> >> | pretty useless as a piece of information in a
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 12:22:36PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>>Andre> Then perhaps
>>Andre> tr [A-Z._] [a-zzz] < POTFILES.in | paste - POTFILES.in | sort |
>>Andre> cut -f 2
>>
>>Isn't this completely unportable? What an ugly solution...
>>
>
> What's unportabl
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 12:22:36PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> Then perhaps
> Andre> tr [A-Z._] [a-zzz] < POTFILES.in | paste - POTFILES.in | sort |
> Andre> cut -f 2
>
> Isn't this completely unportable? What an ugly solution...
What's unportable there? I always thought that the
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:29:13AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre> wrote:
>> Does that handle sorting differences between "a", "." and "_"?
Andre> Hm. No.
>> Also we need the correct filename...
Andre> Then perhaps
Andre> tr
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:29:13AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Does that handle sorting differences between "a", "." and "_"?
Hm. No.
> Also we need the correct filename...
Then perhaps
tr [A-Z._] [a-zzz] < POTFILES.in | paste - POTFILES.in | sort | cut -f 2
should give a good appro
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:14:36AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> we do... and the different sorts, sorts it differently...
>> (that is where we get the problem...)
>
| What about
>
| ... | tr [A-Z] [a-z] | sort
>
| then?
Does that handle sor
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:14:36AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> we do... and the different sorts, sorts it differently...
> (that is where we get the problem...)
What about
... | tr [A-Z] [a-z] | sort
then?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
w
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:01:31AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> To me?
>> The manually created one, but that has been shot down a number of
>> times earlier...
>
| Hm... does the order of entries in that file convey any information?
>
| If not,
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:01:31AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> To me?
> The manually created one, but that has been shot down a number of
> times earlier...
Hm... does the order of entries in that file convey any information?
If not, wouldn't it be sufficient just to run 'sort' on POTFIL
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 12:26:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> So the solution is either to make all generations of this document to
>> use the same sorting rules, _or_ to not have this file automatically
>> genereated, but manually edited/crea
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 12:26:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> So the solution is either to make all generations of this document to
> use the same sorting rules, _or_ to not have this file automatically
> genereated, but manually edited/created instead.
So which one is preferable?
Andre
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 12:49:43AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | It changes all the time. Every build it seems to be different. It's
>> | pretty useless as a piece of information in a diff.
>>
>> _what_ changes in it?
>
| See attachment.
So
On Friday 28 June 2002 06:50, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 12:49:43AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > | It changes all the time. Every build it seems to be different. It's
> > | pretty useless as a piece of information in a diff.
> >
> > _what_ changes in it?
>
> See atta
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 12:49:43AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | It changes all the time. Every build it seems to be different. It's
> | pretty useless as a piece of information in a diff.
>
> _what_ changes in it?
See attachment.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in ord
"Michael A. Koziarski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>>Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>| should this be aded to .cvsignore?
>> | It always shows up in cvs diff, even after a clean
>>| checkout/autogen/configure
>>
>>I guess something in it changed then
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| should this be aded to .cvsignore?
>
>
>| It always shows up in cvs diff, even after a clean
>| checkout/autogen/configure
>
>I guess something in it changed then...
>
>
>
It changes all the time. Every build it seems
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| should this be aded to .cvsignore?
>
| It always shows up in cvs diff, even after a clean
| checkout/autogen/configure
I guess something in it changed then...
--
Lgb
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 05:45:03PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Do we need this file in cvs? I seem to regenerate it on a regular basis (and
> > then have to through it away and cvs update it because the order here is so
> > very different from the one
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 05:45:03PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Do we need this file in cvs? I seem to regenerate it on a regular basis (and
> then have to through it away and cvs update it because the order here is so
> very different from the one you lot create).
go to the archives and sear
27 matches
Mail list logo
