Re: patch for aastex6

2016-04-05 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/05/2016 04:36 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-04-05, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: --] >> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 08:45:17AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >>> For the other patch (acmsiggraph.layout with incompatible version but same >>> cls file name), I woul

Re: patch for aastex6

2016-04-05 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2016-04-05, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: --] > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 08:45:17AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >> For the other patch (acmsiggraph.layout with incompatible version but >> same cls file name), I would wait for an agreement whether to update the >> la

Re: patch for aastex6

2016-04-04 Thread Georg Baum
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 08:45:17AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > >> For the other patch (acmsiggraph.layout with incompatible version but >> same cls file name), I would wait for an agreement whether to update the >> layout (file format change needed) or add a new one. My

Re: patch for aastex6

2016-04-04 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/04/2016 11:23 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 08:45:17AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > >> For the other patch (acmsiggraph.layout with incompatible version but same >> cls file name), I would wait for an agreement whether to update the layout >> (file format change need

Re: patch for aastex6

2016-04-04 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 08:45:17AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > For the other patch (acmsiggraph.layout with incompatible version but > same cls file name), I would wait for an agreement whether to update the > layout (file format change needed) or add a new one. My last preference > is an update

Re: patch for aastex6

2016-04-04 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:29:23PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: > > > The patch is ready. > > > > This is the "new layout for new cls file name" case, similar to what we > > already have for, e.g. scrltr2. > > > > As it looks like we all agree that a new layout does *not* requ

Re: patch for aastex6

2016-04-04 Thread Georg Baum
Guenter Milde wrote: > The patch is ready. > > This is the "new layout for new cls file name" case, similar to what we > already have for, e.g. scrltr2. > > As it looks like we all agree that a new layout does *not* require a file > format update, we could also put this in after rc1. > > Scott,

Re: patch for aastex6

2016-04-04 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2016-04-01, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:08:59PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 03/31/2016 03:45 PM, Georg Baum wrote: >> > Guenter Milde wrote: >> > >> >> For a safe "last minute commit", it would be good if somone could check >> >> the code itself, and the notes in the

Re: patch for aastex6

2016-04-01 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:08:59PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > On 03/31/2016 03:45 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > > Guenter Milde wrote: > > > >> For a safe "last minute commit", it would be good if somone could check > >> the code itself, and the notes in the updated template and example file > >> and t

Re: patch for aastex6

2016-04-01 Thread Georg Baum
Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-03-31, Georg Baum wrote: >> Guenter Milde wrote: > >>> For a safe "last minute commit", it would be good if somone could check >>> the code itself, and the notes in the updated template and example file >>> and then give an explicit +1 or not. > >> I did not test a

Re: patch for aastex6

2016-04-01 Thread Richard Heck
On 03/31/2016 03:45 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: > >> For a safe "last minute commit", it would be good if somone could check >> the code itself, and the notes in the updated template and example file >> and then give an explicit +1 or not. > I did not test anything, but I looked at

Re: patch for aastex6

2016-03-31 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2016-03-31, Georg Baum wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> For a safe "last minute commit", it would be good if somone could check >> the code itself, and the notes in the updated template and example file >> and then give an explicit +1 or not. > I did not test anything, but I looked at the code

Re: patch for aastex6

2016-03-31 Thread Georg Baum
Guenter Milde wrote: > For a safe "last minute commit", it would be good if somone could check > the code itself, and the notes in the updated template and example file > and then give an explicit +1 or not. I did not test anything, but I looked at the code and the notes. They are all OK. The fo

Re: patch for aastex6

2016-03-31 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2016-03-31, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am, 31. März 2016 um 14:35:40, schrieb Guenter Milde >> On 2016-03-31, Kornel Benko wrote: Am 31. März 2016 um 11:01:37, schrieb Guenter Milde >> >> the following patch makes the aastex example and template compilable with >> >> an >> >> up-to-date TeXLive.

Re: patch for aastex6

2016-03-31 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag, 31. März 2016 um 14:35:40, schrieb Guenter Milde > On 2016-03-31, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --] > > > Am Donnerstag, 31. März 2016 um 11:01:37, schrieb Guenter Milde > > > >> Dear LyXers, > > >> the following patch makes the aas

Re: patch for aastex6

2016-03-31 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2016-03-31, Kornel Benko wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --] > Am Donnerstag, 31. März 2016 um 11:01:37, schrieb Guenter Milde > >> Dear LyXers, >> the following patch makes the aastex example and template compilable with an >> up-to-date TeXLive. >> This is a par

Re: patch for aastex6

2016-03-31 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag, 31. März 2016 um 11:01:37, schrieb Guenter Milde > Dear LyXers, > > the following patch makes the aastex example and template compilable with an > up-to-date TeXLive. > > This is a partiall fix for #10027 and should suffice for 2.2. > > TODO: > - support for new commands (see