Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 08:45:17AM +0000, Guenter Milde wrote: > >> For the other patch (acmsiggraph.layout with incompatible version but >> same cls file name), I would wait for an agreement whether to update the >> layout (file format change needed) or add a new one. My last preference >> is an updated layout file. > > Does anyone disagree with having a new one?
No. If we want to use the generic name acmsiggraph.layout for the new version we could still do that later during the 2.3 development cycle, this is nothing which needs to be in 2.2.0. Georg
