On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:29:23PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: > > > The patch is ready. > > > > This is the "new layout for new cls file name" case, similar to what we > > already have for, e.g. scrltr2. > > > > As it looks like we all agree that a new layout does *not* require a file > > format update, we could also put this in after rc1. > > > > Scott, what would you prefer? > > I'd suggest to put it in after 2.2.0 (between rc1 and 2.2.0 should only be > very critical changes).
I agree that layout changes should not be made between RC1 and 2.2.0. > The reason for this is that we could include the new > styles offered by aastex6 right from the beginning. If we publish > aastex6.layout first without them it will be a bit more work do add them > later (but it would be possible, so this is only a slight preference). This would be using ForceLocal? Scott > Alternatively, I could give a +1 for a complete patch tomorrow morning > (Although I am pretty sure that the bits you sent are correct I am a bit > reluctant with combining bots from different messages for a +1).
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature