Lars> I really think cvs access is looming...
Lars> (at least so that you can use cvs add and create patches that include
Lars> the new files)
This last makes sense. Tell me what I have to do.
A
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Allan> Try "make maintainer-clean" and a complete rebuild next time
| Irrelevant, IMO
|
| Allan> make sure your patch includes a patch for Makefile.am. It is CVS HEAD
| Allan> after all. It'd be nice to not break it with what should have been a
| All
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I think my previous arguments that new dialogs should be worked on in a
| separate branch until properly working are starting to prove correct.
Actually, I disagree. It is allowed for the cvs to be incosistent and
not compiling for sort periods of time. Wi
Allan> Try "make maintainer-clean" and a complete rebuild next time
Irrelevant, IMO
Allan> make sure your patch includes a patch for Makefile.am. It is CVS HEAD
Allan> after all. It'd be nice to not break it with what should have been a
Allan> simple addition.
Makefile.am WAS in the patch. I j
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> > I think my previous arguments that new dialogs should be worked on in a
> > separate branch until properly working are starting to prove correct.
> But then no testing except by the person who thinks it works, but does
> not know how to crash it:)
No
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Allan> > Fixed those so it at least compiles and links. Someone else will have to
> Allan> > fix the crash when you open the TOC. I didn't try the other modified
> Allan> > dialogs. Gotta do some thesis work now.
>
> I take it these compile/link erro
Garst> > Allan> > Fixed those so it at least compiles and links. Someone else will
have to
Garst> > Allan> > fix the crash when you open the TOC. I didn't try the other modified
Garst> > Allan> > dialogs. Gotta do some thesis work now.
Garst> > I take it these compile/link errors were due to
>
> Didn't get any thesis work done. Did other things instead and then took
> another quick look to verify my hunch that Angus was still not
> initializing all the variables (I'd seen this last week in FormCitation).
> Sure enough dialog_ was never initialized. Hence we got lots of
> segfaults.
Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> Allan> > Fixed those so it at least compiles and links. Someone else will have to
> Allan> > fix the crash when you open the TOC. I didn't try the other modified
> Allan> > dialogs. Gotta do some thesis work now.
>
> I take it these compile/link errors were due to no
Allan Rae wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, R. Lahaye wrote:
> > The make gets stuck with the recent CVS:
> > (I'm compiling it against xforms 0.89)
>
> Fixed those so it at least compiles and links.
Thanks
> Someone else will have to fix the crash when you open the TOC.
Confirmed.
> I didn't try
Allan> > Fixed those so it at least compiles and links. Someone else will have to
Allan> > fix the crash when you open the TOC. I didn't try the other modified
Allan> > dialogs. Gotta do some thesis work now.
I take it these compile/link errors were due to no "make updatesrc" in
src/frontends/
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, R. Lahaye wrote:
> > The make gets stuck with the recent CVS:
> > (I'm compiling it against xforms 0.89)
>
> Fixed those so it at least compiles and links. Someone else will have to
> fix the crash when you open the TOC. I didn't try t
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, R. Lahaye wrote:
> The make gets stuck with the recent CVS:
> (I'm compiling it against xforms 0.89)
Fixed those so it at least compiles and links. Someone else will have to
fix the crash when you open the TOC. I didn't try the other modified
dialogs. Gotta do some thesis w
"R. Lahaye" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The make gets stuck with the recent CVS:
> (I'm compiling it against xforms 0.89)
Same with 0.88
Garst
14 matches
Mail list logo
