Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Thursday 11 December 2003 20:24, Angus Leeming wrote:
>>
>> The advantage of this scheme would be that each format change would
>> not require a new lyxconvert_xyz.py file, yet files generated with
>> recent cvs versions of LyX would continue to be upgraded.
>
> So the on
On Thursday 11 December 2003 20:24, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> The advantage of this scheme would be that each format change would
> not require a new lyxconvert_xyz.py file, yet files generated with
> recent cvs versions of LyX would continue to be upgraded.
So the only problem is the number of f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Angus,
> I am writing from here since I'm mute,
> I can receive my email but not send it.
> (the #$$%&** mail server is down)
>
> I don't understand your point regarding lyx2lyx.
>
> If I put all the needed functions in one place,
> then I must do it for all the pre
