On Thursday 11 December 2003 20:24, Angus Leeming wrote: > > The advantage of this scheme would be that each format change would > not require a new lyxconvert_xyz.py file, yet files generated with > recent cvs versions of LyX would continue to be upgraded.
So the only problem is the number of files? The files now are self-contained, and easier to read. Also I don't understand what is the policy used to inflate the file format number. :-) Really, if we decide to increase the file format everytime that we change the format I can understand that. Then I would gladly change the transformation scheme to one file by release. Am I so dumb that cann't understand the issue? :-) A simple yes is not an answer. ;-) -- José Abílio LyX and docbook, a perfect match. :-)
