Jose' Matos wrote: > On Thursday 11 December 2003 20:24, Angus Leeming wrote: >> >> The advantage of this scheme would be that each format change would >> not require a new lyxconvert_xyz.py file, yet files generated with >> recent cvs versions of LyX would continue to be upgraded. > > So the only problem is the number of files?
Yes. > The files now are self-contained, and easier to read. > > Also I don't understand what is the policy used to inflate the > file format number. :-) Each change should increment the file format by 1. That that doesn't happen at the moment is largely because that means adding a new pair of files to lyx2lyx > Really, if we decide to increase the file format everytime that we > change the format I can understand that. Then I would gladly > change the transformation scheme to one file by release. Seems sensible to me. > Am I so dumb that cann't understand the issue? :-) > A simple yes is not an answer. ;-) You have understood what I was trying to say, despite my inability to express myself clearly, so you clearly aren't soooooooo dumb. -- Angus
