Abdel wrote:
> In any case, I have noticed that the Qt3 frontend has not seen much
> change for the last year so it would be an easy task to maintain Qt3 in
> parallel.
Right. The effort expended in maintaining working code is minimal.
--
Angus
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Are you sure? Is it really easy to use qt4 and qt3 in parallel in a
> | reasonably standard KDE-based linux distribution?
Yes. Doing so here and now. Running KDE4 and KDE3 in parallel is an
entirely different kettle of fish.
> And what distributions will give us qt4
Andre Poenitz a écrit :
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:45:17AM +0100, Abdel wrote:
I think we should get rid of them in the long run and favour 'proper'
Qt 4 classes (even if the Q3* stuff is officially part of Qt4)
I am getting rid of most of them right now.
Nice.
[...] By the way is there a ru
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:45:17AM +0100, Abdel wrote:
> >I think we should get rid of them in the long run and favour 'proper'
> >Qt 4 classes (even if the Q3* stuff is officially part of Qt4)
>
> I am getting rid of most of them right now.
Nice.
> [...] By the way is there a rule concerning th
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 09:58:41AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> Actually I don't think there won't be a need to maintain two Qt
> Andre> frontends in parallel. As soon as some Qt 4.x version works,
> Andre> 3.x should be
Andre Poenitz a écrit :
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 11:43:05AM +0100, Abdel wrote:
Dear developpers,
I could not sleep last night so I tried as an exercise to see if lyx
could be ported easily to the fresh Qt-4.1. As you might guess it was
more difficult than I originally thought. But after much
Andre Poenitz a écrit :
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 08:51:02PM +0100, Abdel wrote:
Hello,
Judging from the absence of answer, I suppose this matter is not
interesting to you :-(
You culd have as well assumed people were absent from ailing lists.
Would be closer to the truth at least in my case.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Andre> Actually I don't think there won't be a need to maintain two Qt
| Andre> frontends in parallel. As soon as some Qt 4.x version works,
| Andre> 3.x should be removed.
|
| Are y
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> Actually I don't think there won't be a need to maintain two Qt
Andre> frontends in parallel. As soon as some Qt 4.x version works,
Andre> 3.x should be removed.
Are you sure? Is it really easy to use qt4 and qt3 in parallel in a
r
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 11:43:05AM +0100, Abdel wrote:
> Dear developpers,
>
> I could not sleep last night so I tried as an exercise to see if lyx
> could be ported easily to the fresh Qt-4.1. As you might guess it was
> more difficult than I originally thought. But after much work it
> compil
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 08:51:02PM +0100, Abdel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Judging from the absence of answer, I suppose this matter is not
> interesting to you :-(
You culd have as well assumed people were absent from ailing lists.
Would be closer to the truth at least in my case.
> It's OK, I unders
Abdel wrote:
> Don't worry this is not (yet) an help request, just a status report on
> my qt4 port. From now, I will just wait until lyx-1.4 is released and
> for someone who is interested to help me.
> The good news (see attached) is that I am able to load any lyx document
> without crashing :-).
Hello,
Don't worry this is not (yet) an help request, just a status report on
my qt4 port. From now, I will just wait until lyx-1.4 is released and
for someone who is interested to help me.
The good news (see attached) is that I am able to load any lyx document
without crashing :-). The bad ne
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Abdel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Then I'd suggest that you create a bug "Implement qt4 frontend", and
| > attach the diff to it.
|
| Why not create a qt4 directory (same as xform or gtk) along qt2 in the
| cvs repository once 1.5cvs is opened? But I can certa
Abdel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Then I'd suggest that you create a bug "Implement qt4 frontend", and
| > attach the diff to it.
|
| Why not create a qt4 directory (same as xform or gtk) along qt2 in the
| cvs repository once 1.5cvs is opened? But I can certainly do what you
| suggest once I
On Thursday 29 December 2005 23:36, Abdel wrote:
> Why not create a qt4 directory (same as xform or gtk) along qt2 in the
> cvs repository once 1.5cvs is opened?
Yes, why not. But that would work with the diff approach, too:
- create qt4 directory as copy of qt2 directory
- apply your patch to the
Georg Baum a écrit :
On Thursday 29 December 2005 20:51, Abdel wrote:
Hello,
Judging from the absence of answer, I suppose this matter is not
interesting to you :-(
It's OK, I understand that you are all very busy with the release of
1.4.0. I have worked some more on the port so if there is any
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Abdel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hello,
|
| Judging from the absence of answer, I suppose this matter is not
| interesting to you :-(
Oh it is, but as you rightly suspect: not right now.
| It's OK, I understand that you are all very busy with the release of
|
On Thursday 29 December 2005 20:51, Abdel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Judging from the absence of answer, I suppose this matter is not
> interesting to you :-(
> It's OK, I understand that you are all very busy with the release of
> 1.4.0. I have worked some more on the port so if there is any interest
> i
Abdel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hello,
|
| Judging from the absence of answer, I suppose this matter is not
| interesting to you :-(
Oh it is, but as you rightly suspect: not right now.
| It's OK, I understand that you are all very busy with the release of
| 1.4.0. I have worked some more o
Hello,
Judging from the absence of answer, I suppose this matter is not
interesting to you :-(
It's OK, I understand that you are all very busy with the release of
1.4.0. I have worked some more on the port so if there is any interest
in the future, just let me know. FYI, the changes from Qt3
21 matches
Mail list logo