Re: lyx-1.4.0 and Qt-4.1

2006-01-09 Thread Angus Leeming
Abdel wrote: > In any case, I have noticed that the Qt3 frontend has not seen much > change for the last year so it would be an easy task to maintain Qt3 in > parallel. Right. The effort expended in maintaining working code is minimal. -- Angus

Re: lyx-1.4.0 and Qt-4.1

2006-01-09 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | Are you sure? Is it really easy to use qt4 and qt3 in parallel in a > | reasonably standard KDE-based linux distribution? Yes. Doing so here and now. Running KDE4 and KDE3 in parallel is an entirely different kettle of fish. > And what distributions will give us qt4

Re: lyx-1.4.0 and Qt-4.1

2006-01-09 Thread Abdel
Andre Poenitz a écrit : On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:45:17AM +0100, Abdel wrote: I think we should get rid of them in the long run and favour 'proper' Qt 4 classes (even if the Q3* stuff is officially part of Qt4) I am getting rid of most of them right now. Nice. [...] By the way is there a ru

Re: lyx-1.4.0 and Qt-4.1

2006-01-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:45:17AM +0100, Abdel wrote: > >I think we should get rid of them in the long run and favour 'proper' > >Qt 4 classes (even if the Q3* stuff is officially part of Qt4) > > I am getting rid of most of them right now. Nice. > [...] By the way is there a rule concerning th

Re: lyx-1.4.0 and Qt-4.1

2006-01-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 09:58:41AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Andre> Actually I don't think there won't be a need to maintain two Qt > Andre> frontends in parallel. As soon as some Qt 4.x version works, > Andre> 3.x should be

Re: lyx-1.4.0 and Qt-4.1

2006-01-09 Thread Abdel
Andre Poenitz a écrit : On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 11:43:05AM +0100, Abdel wrote: Dear developpers, I could not sleep last night so I tried as an exercise to see if lyx could be ported easily to the fresh Qt-4.1. As you might guess it was more difficult than I originally thought. But after much

Re: lyx-1.4.0 and Qt-4.1

2006-01-09 Thread Abdel
Andre Poenitz a écrit : On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 08:51:02PM +0100, Abdel wrote: Hello, Judging from the absence of answer, I suppose this matter is not interesting to you :-( You culd have as well assumed people were absent from ailing lists. Would be closer to the truth at least in my case.

Re: lyx-1.4.0 and Qt-4.1

2006-01-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Andre> Actually I don't think there won't be a need to maintain two Qt | Andre> frontends in parallel. As soon as some Qt 4.x version works, | Andre> 3.x should be removed. | | Are y

Re: lyx-1.4.0 and Qt-4.1

2006-01-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> Actually I don't think there won't be a need to maintain two Qt Andre> frontends in parallel. As soon as some Qt 4.x version works, Andre> 3.x should be removed. Are you sure? Is it really easy to use qt4 and qt3 in parallel in a r

Re: lyx-1.4.0 and Qt-4.1

2006-01-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 11:43:05AM +0100, Abdel wrote: > Dear developpers, > > I could not sleep last night so I tried as an exercise to see if lyx > could be ported easily to the fresh Qt-4.1. As you might guess it was > more difficult than I originally thought. But after much work it > compil

Re: lyx-1.4.0 and Qt-4.1

2006-01-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 08:51:02PM +0100, Abdel wrote: > Hello, > > Judging from the absence of answer, I suppose this matter is not > interesting to you :-( You culd have as well assumed people were absent from ailing lists. Would be closer to the truth at least in my case. > It's OK, I unders

Re: lyx-1.4.0 and Qt-4.1

2005-12-31 Thread Angus Leeming
Abdel wrote: > Don't worry this is not (yet) an help request, just a status report on > my qt4 port. From now, I will just wait until lyx-1.4 is released and > for someone who is interested to help me. > The good news (see attached) is that I am able to load any lyx document > without crashing :-).

Re: lyx-1.4.0 and Qt-4.1

2005-12-31 Thread Abdel
Hello, Don't worry this is not (yet) an help request, just a status report on my qt4 port. From now, I will just wait until lyx-1.4 is released and for someone who is interested to help me. The good news (see attached) is that I am able to load any lyx document without crashing :-). The bad ne

Re: lyx-1.4.0 and Qt-4.1

2005-12-29 Thread Abdel
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : Abdel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > Then I'd suggest that you create a bug "Implement qt4 frontend", and | > attach the diff to it. | | Why not create a qt4 directory (same as xform or gtk) along qt2 in the | cvs repository once 1.5cvs is opened? But I can certa

Re: lyx-1.4.0 and Qt-4.1

2005-12-29 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > Then I'd suggest that you create a bug "Implement qt4 frontend", and | > attach the diff to it. | | Why not create a qt4 directory (same as xform or gtk) along qt2 in the | cvs repository once 1.5cvs is opened? But I can certainly do what you | suggest once I

Re: lyx-1.4.0 and Qt-4.1

2005-12-29 Thread Georg Baum
On Thursday 29 December 2005 23:36, Abdel wrote: > Why not create a qt4 directory (same as xform or gtk) along qt2 in the > cvs repository once 1.5cvs is opened? Yes, why not. But that would work with the diff approach, too: - create qt4 directory as copy of qt2 directory - apply your patch to the

Re: lyx-1.4.0 and Qt-4.1

2005-12-29 Thread Abdel
Georg Baum a écrit : On Thursday 29 December 2005 20:51, Abdel wrote: Hello, Judging from the absence of answer, I suppose this matter is not interesting to you :-( It's OK, I understand that you are all very busy with the release of 1.4.0. I have worked some more on the port so if there is any

Re: lyx-1.4.0 and Qt-4.1

2005-12-29 Thread Abdel
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : Abdel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hello, | | Judging from the absence of answer, I suppose this matter is not | interesting to you :-( Oh it is, but as you rightly suspect: not right now. | It's OK, I understand that you are all very busy with the release of |

Re: lyx-1.4.0 and Qt-4.1

2005-12-29 Thread Georg Baum
On Thursday 29 December 2005 20:51, Abdel wrote: > Hello, > > Judging from the absence of answer, I suppose this matter is not > interesting to you :-( > It's OK, I understand that you are all very busy with the release of > 1.4.0. I have worked some more on the port so if there is any interest > i

Re: lyx-1.4.0 and Qt-4.1

2005-12-29 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hello, | | Judging from the absence of answer, I suppose this matter is not | interesting to you :-( Oh it is, but as you rightly suspect: not right now. | It's OK, I understand that you are all very busy with the release of | 1.4.0. I have worked some more o

Re: lyx-1.4.0 and Qt-4.1

2005-12-29 Thread Abdel
Hello, Judging from the absence of answer, I suppose this matter is not interesting to you :-( It's OK, I understand that you are all very busy with the release of 1.4.0. I have worked some more on the port so if there is any interest in the future, just let me know. FYI, the changes from Qt3