Re: graphic inset

2002-01-28 Thread Herbert Voss
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: >>gluelength are not possible here, make no sense and are >>not allowed in latex >> > > Ehr... of course. I meant lyxlength: enter "1cm" directly in the input > field or use the choice (like you have done in display size). ok, that's another point. I will think ab

Re: graphic inset

2002-01-28 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Herbert Voss wrote: > > - You should probably delete the unsigned_float_filters from width > > and height (FormGraphics.C: 116-117) to allow the user to insert > > gluelengths like in the other fields (btw: I have added filters > > which spit out warnings if the input is nonsense in the other > >

Re: graphic inset

2002-01-28 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 28 January 2002 4:59 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > > >>there are only some things to finished: > >>- asynchronous loading of files -> Angus is on the way ... > >>- take the lyx-width/height for displaying in lyx. > > > I had a look but didn't really find where the >

Re: graphic inset

2002-01-28 Thread Herbert Voss
Angus Leeming wrote: >>there are only some things to finished: >>- asynchronous loading of files -> Angus is on the way ... >>- take the lyx-width/height for displaying in lyx. I had a look but didn't really find where the lyxwidth and lyxheight had to go ... Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/

Re: graphic inset

2002-01-28 Thread Angus Leeming
Very impressive Herbert. You've been busy! I have made one small change here to get the code to compile. My compiler choked on scale = lex.getInteger(); in insetgraphicsParams.C because scale was a string! I therefore changed InsetGraphicsParams::scale from a string to an int as that

Re: graphic inset

2002-01-28 Thread Herbert Voss
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Herbert Voss wrote: > > I finished the graphic inset, the diff is attached. Images of > > the guis are here: > > Herbert, I have played a little bit with your patch. Here are some > comments (this time not so nitpicking, I hope). :-) > - Sugges

Re: graphic inset

2002-01-28 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Herbert Voss wrote: > I finished the graphic inset, the diff is attached. Images of > the guis are here: Herbert, I have played a little bit with your patch. Here are some comments (this time not so nitpicking, I hope). First: I really like it :-) - Suggestion: I guess you will leave the "Disp

Re: graphic inset

2002-01-27 Thread John Levon
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 06:06:17PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > hey, is this not your day??? these are peanuts and take 15 seconds > to change and it's not worth to have a discussion about that! yes you're quite right. I should actually test the patch ! sorry john -- "ALL television is childr

Re: graphic inset

2002-01-27 Thread Herbert Voss
John Levon wrote: > On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 06:00:27PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > > >>>- We have recently introduced a separation of checkboxes and >>>radiobuttons in the dialogs. Radiobuttons are "round3dbuttons" in >>> >>looks zgly to me! >> > > zgly or not, you should be consistent with

Re: graphic inset

2002-01-27 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
John Levon wrote: > On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 06:00:27PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > > >- We have recently introduced a separation of checkboxes and > > >radiobuttons in the dialogs. Radiobuttons are "round3dbuttons" in > > > > looks zgly to me! > > zgly or not, you should be consistent with the re

Re: graphic inset

2002-01-27 Thread Herbert Voss
John Levon wrote: >>there are only some things to finished: >>- asynchronous loading of files -> Angus is on the way ... >> (the only important thing) >> > you removed it from the todo in the grahpcs code ? uups, a mistake, too much stuff should be rewritten anyway. with a short descript

Re: graphic inset

2002-01-27 Thread John Levon
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 06:00:27PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > >- We have recently introduced a separation of checkboxes and > >radiobuttons in the dialogs. Radiobuttons are "round3dbuttons" in > > looks zgly to me! zgly or not, you should be consistent with the rest of lyx. We changed it sp

Re: graphic inset

2002-01-27 Thread Herbert Voss
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > - We have recently introduced a separation of checkboxes and > radiobuttons in the dialogs. Radiobuttons are "round3dbuttons" in looks zgly to me! > fdesign. In your dialog, I think the display options (Don't Display > etc.) and the (LateX-) Size options (Defau

Re: graphic inset

2002-01-27 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Herbert Voss wrote: > I finished the graphic inset, the diff is attached. Images of > the guis are here: Very impressive, Herbert! Looks like you have been very busy ;-) One question: Wouldn't it make sense to have a scale option for LyX-view, too? (well I'm not shure). Please excuse me if I ha

Re: graphic inset

2002-01-27 Thread John Levon
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 05:07:29PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > I finished the graphic inset, the diff is attached. Images of looks nice. haven't tried it. > there are only some things to finished: > - asynchronous loading of files -> Angus is on the way ... > (the only important thing) you

Re: graphic inset - fixing wrong file extension

2002-01-20 Thread Herbert Voss
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Herbert Voss wrote: > >> attached a fix, for the missing "ps"- file extension, when >> browsing a file from the graphic gui > > > I'll apply it in a minute. Note however that including a ps file is a > very bad idea in general, since you have no guarantee on their