John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 05:10:37PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
>> > readd an unconditional updateScreen() call to
>> > BufferView_pimpl.C:workAreaResize().
>>
>> And how does this translate into English?
>
| dunno how to make it clearer ? Perhaps :
>
|
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 05:10:37PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > readd an unconditional updateScreen() call to
> > BufferView_pimpl.C:workAreaResize().
>
> And how does this translate into English?
dunno how to make it clearer ? Perhaps :
vi BufferView_pimpl.C
/::workAreaResize
/^}
i
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 04:07:35PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > _but_ I have never had problems with LyX and saveunders with this WM
> > ealier, so it must be somehting that we do different.
>
> readd an unconditional updateScreen() call to
> BufferView_pimpl.C:workAreaResize().
And how does th
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 02:34:30PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> _but_ I have never had problems with LyX and saveunders with this WM
> ealier, so it must be somehting that we do different.
readd an unconditional updateScreen() call to
BufferView_pimpl.C:workAreaResize(). This should fix x
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Andre> On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 01:31:14PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
| Andre> wrote:
>>> I have to admit that I thought this issue would be discussed/solved
>>> in porto, and I am a b
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 01:31:14PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> I have to admit that I thought this issue would be discussed/solved
>> in porto, and I am a bit disappointed to see that it seem it was
>> not even dis
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 12:42:00PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> That I know that it doesn't help, but after John last patch I am unable to
> run LyX at all. It core dumps at start with a segfault. So I think that I can
> complain also.
Things are only slightly better here: It ru
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 01:31:14PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I have to admit that I thought this issue would be discussed/solved in
> porto, and I am a bit disappointed to see that it seem it was not even
> discussed there.
I have the impressions that things are a bit better know altho
> "José" == José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I have to admit that I thought this issue would be discussed/solved
>> in porto, and I am a bit disappointed to see that it seem it was
>> not even discussed there.
José> Actually this was discussed, because I took to th
On Monday 01 July 2002 12:31, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Concerning the fact that I cannot run 1.3.0, I have not been
> complaining too much about it recently because I hardly have enough
> time to work on 1.2.1 these days. Of course, t
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Well maybe I am drunk but this makes me fume. JMarc can't even
John> use 1.3.0 AT ALL thanks to your broken changes and you're
John> whining about some minor draw problems you could fix yourself if
John> you took ten minutes.
Concernin
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 08:42:19AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> | More informed bug reports are welcome.
>>
>> Meaning that my report is wrong or that you want more details?
>
| More details. But looking it's obvious - your WM doesn't do saveund
On Monday 24 June 2002 12:02 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 08:42:19AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > | More informed bug reports are welcome.
> >
> > Meaning that my report is wrong or that you want more details?
>
> More details. But looking it's obvious - your WM doesn't
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 08:42:19AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | More informed bug reports are welcome.
>
> Meaning that my report is wrong or that you want more details?
More details. But looking it's obvious - your WM doesn't do saveunders
for menus, and we're not doing the copy of th
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> One of the last commits broke redraw of the WorkArea.
>
> Just load a document, open an menu, close it and see for yourselves.
just like http://www.lyx.org/~voss/workarea.gif
>
> If not fixed fairly quickly the patch(es) must be reverted.
as John said ...
Herb
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 01:48:27AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> It seems to me that the screen::expose is using the pixmaps wrong or
>> something.
>
| More informed bug reports are welcome.
Meaning that my report is wrong or that you want more d
Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> One of the last commits broke redraw of the WorkArea.
>> Just load a document, open an menu, close it and see for yourselves.
>
>
| just like http://www.lyx.org/~voss/workarea.gif
exactly.
>> If not fixed fairly quickly
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 01:48:27AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> It seems to me that the screen::expose is using the pixmaps wrong or
> something.
More informed bug reports are welcome.
> I can now even trigger a "Total Grey Out", by moving _into_ the the
> workarea...
>- have the wor
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 11:33:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> One of the last commits broke redraw of the WorkArea.
>
> Just load a document, open an menu, close it and see for yourselves.
Don't see a problem. I see some problems, but not this one.
> If not fixed fairly quickly the pa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| One of the last commits broke redraw of the WorkArea.
>
| Just load a document, open an menu, close it and see for yourselves.
>
| If not fixed fairly quickly the patch(es) must be reverted.
It seems to me that the screen::expose is using the pix
20 matches
Mail list logo
