On Monday 24 June 2002 12:02 pm, John Levon wrote: > On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 08:42:19AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > | More informed bug reports are welcome. > > > > Meaning that my report is wrong or that you want more details? > > More details. But looking it's obvious - your WM doesn't do saveunders > for menus, and we're not doing the copy of the pixmap at FL_DRAW time. > Related to the stuff me & angus were talking aobut.
As I see it, the current code is much the same as the old code. The philosophy behind the code has not changed yet anyway. So do the changes you've introduced so far fall between two stools? Ie, they are neither the new way nor the old way, they're just broken? More importantly, is it fixable without going the whole way? As you'll gather, I'm confused by what you actually did commit on Friday. Could you post the patch and/or explain it? Certainly give an explantation of what you did and why. Help us keep up with you ;-) > > And I am at least pestering someone about the problems I see. > > If you (or anyone else) just keep quiet how am I supposed to know that > > you still have a problem. > > Yes, I remember how quiet everyone was about the boost changes. > > > Because the boost changes are making a _running_ lyx misbehave in what > > way? (and are you really unable to keep issues separate?) > > Because I was drunk gimme a break ... Bad behaviour when drunk is still bad behaviour. STFU is no way to behave. An old prude.
