Re: crash with todays cvs

2002-03-12 Thread Edwin Leuven
> Edwin please have a look (you may have to wait a bit until the cvs mirror > is uptodate with the main cvs tree). document loads again, thanks! Ed.

Re: crash with todays cvs

2002-03-12 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 12-Mar-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote: > easy in this case. I'll have a look. Ok this WAS really easy. But I think that the culpable is really the Paragraph which now does not set it's layout information. We should change this in 1.3. Edwin please have a look (you may have to wait a bit until the

Re: crash with todays cvs

2002-03-12 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 12-Mar-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >| Well I don't know if we should be so strickt. If we can handle it >| we should try to support as much backward as it is possible, until >| we have an external convert program which does the converting stuff >| for us. > > the problem is that the old

Re: crash with todays cvs

2002-03-12 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 12-Mar-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> 1.1.5 sound right. >> >> Actually we should probably not allow 1.2.0cvs to load that document >> at all. My guess is that if you loaded the document in 1.1.6 first, >> then 1.2.0 would not have a problemat

Re: crash with todays cvs

2002-03-12 Thread Edwin Leuven
> 1.1.5 sound right. > > Actually we should probably not allow 1.2.0cvs to load that document > at all. My guess is that if you loaded the document in 1.1.6 first, > then 1.2.0 would not have a problemat all. Matter of fact is that I never made the switch to 1.1.6 because of the crappy table sup

Re: crash with todays cvs

2002-03-12 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 12-Mar-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > 1.1.5 sound right. > > Actually we should probably not allow 1.2.0cvs to load that document > at all. My guess is that if you loaded the document in 1.1.6 first, > then 1.2.0 would not have a problemat all. Well I don't know if we should be so strick

Re: crash with todays cvs

2002-03-12 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> What version of LyX created this doc? > | Wouldn't know that exactly. The original was probably done with 1.1.5fix2 but | it's quite possible that I have edited the doc with a recent cvs version | since then... eh, no... 1.1.5 sound right. Actually

Re: crash with todays cvs

2002-03-12 Thread Edwin Leuven
> What version of LyX created this doc? Wouldn't know that exactly. The original was probably done with 1.1.5fix2 but it's quite possible that I have edited the doc with a recent cvs version since then... Ed.

Re: crash with todays cvs

2002-03-12 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Crash when loading attached doc... What version of LyX created this doc? -- Lgb

Re: crash with todays cvs

2002-03-12 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Crash when loading attached doc... > > | Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. | 0x4025dae1 in __kill () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 | Current language: auto; currently c | (gdb) bt | #0 0x4025dae1 in __kill () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 | #1 0x4025d8b