> 1.1.5 sound right. > > Actually we should probably not allow 1.2.0cvs to load that document > at all. My guess is that if you loaded the document in 1.1.6 first, > then 1.2.0 would not have a problemat all.
Matter of fact is that I never made the switch to 1.1.6 because of the crappy table support. I can imagine that I am not the only one... Moreover, until recently this doc loaded fine... Ed.
