Re: beamer.layout

2016-03-19 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Mittwoch, 16. März 2016 um 16:01:31, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien > Le 16/03/2016 14:32, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : > > 2016-03-16 9:31 GMT+01:00 Jean-Pierre Chrétien > >: > > > > Hello, > > > > While updating the French version of examples/beamer

Re: beamer.layout

2016-03-19 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2016-03-16 9:31 GMT+01:00 Jean-Pierre Chrétien : > Hello, > > While updating the French version of examples/beamer.lyx for master, > I saw that due to the translation of the message, > the columns and column label go far in the left margin and do not appear > completely > to the user in the "Colo

Re: beamer.layout

2016-03-19 Thread Jean-Pierre Chrétien
Le 16/03/2016 14:32, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : 2016-03-16 9:31 GMT+01:00 Jean-Pierre Chrétien >: Hello, While updating the French version of examples/beamer.lyx for master, I saw that due to the translation of the message, the columns and c

Re: beamer.layout

2016-03-18 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2016-03-16 17:58 GMT+01:00 Kornel Benko: > 2.) The string for 'LeftMargin' e.g. "Columns (top aligned)xx" is not > part of the translations. >Therefore all sizes depend on the length of the English version. > This is what we should address. Jürgen > > Kornel >

Re: beamer.layout

2007-05-12 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Martin Vermeer wrote: > BTW what about \structure yes. > and \example? I don't see an example command (only an environment). Jürgen

Re: beamer.layout

2007-05-10 Thread Jean-Pierre Chrétien
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jean-Pierre> Should I provide fresh patch ? Done, patch against 1.5.0 svn added. -- Jean-Pierre

Re: beamer.layout

2007-05-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jean-Pierre" == Jean-Pierre Chrétien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jean-Pierre> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [..] >> As this does not change the document version number, I would put >> this in unless someone raises objections. Small improvements are >> improvements too. Jean-P

Re: beamer.layout

2007-05-10 Thread Jean-Pierre Chrétien
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [..] > > As this does not change the document version number, I would put this in > unless someone raises objections. Small improvements are improvements too. I'm afraid I left TitleLaTeXName frame[plain]{\maketitle} instead of the original TitleLaTeXNa

Re: [Patch with lyx2lyx] Re: beamer.layout

2007-05-10 Thread Martin Vermeer
More up to date patch. Untested. - Martin Now really going... Index: src/Buffer.cpp === --- src/Buffer.cpp (revision 18254) +++ src/Buffer.cpp (working copy) @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ namespace { -int const LYX_FORMAT = 269;

Re: [Patch with lyx2lyx] Re: beamer.layout

2007-05-10 Thread José Matos
On Thursday 10 May 2007 06:32:48 Martin Vermeer wrote: > OK, I did this under breakfast ;-) Leaving for a foreign trip (Belgium, > here we come ;-) Back next Monday. Since yesterday, and until next Sunday, I am in Copenhagen. :-) I took the opportunity due to this week break in classes to vis

Re: beamer.layout

2007-05-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> As this does not change the document version number, I would Martin> put this in unless someone raises objections. Small Martin> improvements are improvements too. Good idea. JMarc

Re: beamer.layout

2007-05-10 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:15:47AM +, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Martin> Who is responsible for beamer.layout nowadays? > > > > Us. > > > > Seeing that you w

Re: beamer.layout

2007-05-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jean-Pierre" == Jean-Pierre Chrétien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jean-Pierre> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Martin> Who is responsible for beamer.layout nowadays? >> Us. Jean-Pierre> I make here a sepa

Re: beamer.layout

2007-05-10 Thread José Matos
On Thursday 10 May 2007 09:26:46 Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: > Is there a simple way to control this from the LyX document > instead of the layout ? Not yet. :-( > -- > Jean-Pierre -- José Abílio

Re: beamer.layout

2007-05-10 Thread Jean-Pierre Chrétien
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Martin> Who is responsible for beamer.layout nowadays? > > Us. I make here a separate post about bug 3133. I find quite boring to have to change the layout to switch from a fu

Re: beamer.layout

2007-05-10 Thread Jean-Pierre Chrétien
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Martin> Who is responsible for beamer.layout nowadays? > > Us. > Seeing that you were discussing the beamer layout, I proposed a patch on bugzilla for enhancement 3141. Rega

[Patch with lyx2lyx] Re: beamer.layout

2007-05-09 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 07:21:53AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:05:23PM +0100, José Matos wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 May 2007 20:56:49 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > Martin Vermeer a écrit : > > > > Then the attached patch will do. > > > > > > > > OK to commit? > > >

Re: beamer.layout

2007-05-09 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:05:23PM +0100, José Matos wrote: > On Wednesday 09 May 2007 20:56:49 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Martin Vermeer a écrit : > > > Then the attached patch will do. > > > > > > OK to commit? > > > > Are we supposed to do something wrt lyx2lyx? > > To support lyx 1.4. H

Re: beamer.layout

2007-05-09 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:56:49PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Martin Vermeer a écrit : > > >Then the attached patch will do. > > > >OK to commit? > > Are we supposed to do something wrt lyx2lyx? > > JMarc You mean, convert it back to ERT on back conversion? - Martin

Re: beamer.layout

2007-05-09 Thread José Matos
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 20:56:49 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Martin Vermeer a écrit : > > Then the attached patch will do. > > > > OK to commit? > > Are we supposed to do something wrt lyx2lyx? To support lyx 1.4. Have I said how much I hate to support previous versions with lyx2lyx? ;-)

Re: beamer.layout

2007-05-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Martin Vermeer a écrit : Then the attached patch will do. OK to commit? Are we supposed to do something wrt lyx2lyx? JMarc

Re: beamer.layout

2007-05-09 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 04:06:36PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > Are you familiar enough with beamer to say off the cuff what else > > besides \alert we should support in this way? > > from a quick scan in my memory and in the beamer userguide, I didn't find > a

Re: beamer.layout

2007-05-09 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin Vermeer wrote: > Are you familiar enough with beamer to say off the cuff what else > besides \alert we should support in this way? from a quick scan in my memory and in the beamer userguide, I didn't find anything further. Jürgen

Re: beamer.layout

2007-05-09 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 02:10:15PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > Who is responsible for beamer.layout nowadays? It would be easy to > > implement \alert as a character style > > Yes, we should do this. > > Jürgen Are you familiar enough with beamer to say off

Re: beamer.layout

2007-05-09 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin Vermeer wrote: > Who is responsible for beamer.layout nowadays? It would be easy to > implement \alert as a character style Yes, we should do this. Jürgen

Re: beamer.layout

2007-05-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> Who is responsible for beamer.layout nowadays? Us. JMarc

Re: beamer.layout for lyx 1.4?

2006-03-08 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 19:10, Rex Dieter wrote: > Just thinking down the road... are there any other .layout candidates > for inclusion?  If so, perhaps these bits could be packaged separately > (because it'd be a shame to have to rebuild/reinstall *all* of lyx just > for 1/2/10 additinal .layo

Re: beamer.layout for lyx 1.4?

2006-03-08 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 19:04, Rex Dieter wrote: I'm sorry if you receiving this message twice. > > Rex, > > could you please add this layout file (Bo's version) to FE rpm? > > > > Since tetex-latex rpm already includes beamer all the requirements are > > already required. > > You

Re: beamer.layout for lyx 1.4?

2006-03-08 Thread Bo Peng
> The newer version from Bo Peng is only different in defining a > subsubsection. Now I remember. :-) Beamer supports subsubsection but the layout file does not define it. I added one by myself when I needed it. I guess this is not important to the general users. Bo

Re: beamer.layout for lyx 1.4?

2006-03-08 Thread Neal Becker
Neal Becker wrote: > I have a beamer.layout that works for lyx 1.3, but it doesn't appear to be > working with 1.4. Do I need an updated beamer.layout or am I just doing > something wrong? Sorry, operator error I think. I somehow inserted something not visible that was screwing things up when r

Re: beamer.layout for lyx 1.4?

2006-03-08 Thread Rex Dieter
Rex Dieter wrote: Jose' Matos wrote: On Wednesday 08 March 2006 18:42, Bo Peng wrote: I have a beamer.layout that works for lyx 1.3, but it doesn't appear to be working with 1.4. Do I need an updated beamer.layout or am I just doing something wrong? Please try the attached layout file. I

Re: beamer.layout for lyx 1.4?

2006-03-08 Thread Rex Dieter
Jose' Matos wrote: On Wednesday 08 March 2006 18:42, Bo Peng wrote: I have a beamer.layout that works for lyx 1.3, but it doesn't appear to be working with 1.4. Do I need an updated beamer.layout or am I just doing something wrong? Please try the attached layout file. I remember that I did s

Re: beamer.layout for lyx 1.4?

2006-03-08 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 18:34, Neal Becker wrote: > I have a beamer.layout that works for lyx 1.3, but it doesn't appear to be > working with 1.4. Do I need an updated beamer.layout or am I just doing > something wrong? The original layout file that can be found in the beamer site works. http

Re: beamer.layout for lyx 1.4?

2006-03-08 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 18:42, Bo Peng wrote: > > I have a beamer.layout that works for lyx 1.3, but it doesn't appear to > > be working with 1.4. Do I need an updated beamer.layout or am I just > > doing something wrong? > > Please try the attached layout file. I remember that I did some > mod

Re: beamer.layout for lyx 1.4?

2006-03-08 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 18:42, Bo Peng wrote: > > I have a beamer.layout that works for lyx 1.3, but it doesn't appear to > > be working with 1.4. Do I need an updated beamer.layout or am I just > > doing something wrong? > > Please try the attached layout file. I remember that I did some > mod

Re: beamer.layout for lyx 1.4?

2006-03-08 Thread Bo Peng
> I have a beamer.layout that works for lyx 1.3, but it doesn't appear to be > working with 1.4. Do I need an updated beamer.layout or am I just doing > something wrong? Please try the attached layout file. I remember that I did some modifications but forget the details. Bo beamer.layout Descr