On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 03:36:03PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Please tell me how to obtain the archives of lyx-devel and lyx-cvs from
> June-August 2002.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lyx-devel&r=1&w=2
regards
john
--
"Yeah, I woke up in the day accidentally once, the moon was on fire for
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 02:30:17PM +, John Levon wrote:
> Please point me to where in the mailing list you mentioned you were
> going to do this.
Please tell me how to obtain the archives of lyx-devel and lyx-cvs from
June-August 2002.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 03:13:15PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > I can't say I'm happy about you sneaking the UI in under our noses.
>
> Please?
>
> Care to post your definition of "sneaking in thing under your noses"?
Please point me to where in the mailing list you mentioned you were
going
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 02:15:46PM +, John Levon wrote:
> Oh, sure. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure it is useful for a number of
> people. The question is whether it's really needed by the "default
> user". But it seems you don't like arguing about UI, so in the future
> I'll just fix stuff back w
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 03:11:03PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > You are a developer.
>
> Currently I am a user.
OK sure. A particularly able and clued-in power user ...
> Btw: this was not my idea in the beginning
> but I found it so useful that I adapted it.
Oh, sure. Don't get me wrong, I
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 02:11:22PM +, John Levon wrote:
> I can't say I'm happy about you sneaking the UI in under our noses.
Please?
Care to post your definition of "sneaking in thing under your noses"?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not hav
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 02:08:18PM +, John Levon wrote:
> > I certainly would like to have it.
>
> You are a developer.
Currently I am a user.
> > Maybe the item could be moved down in the menu close to the latex log
> > file and we could call it 'View LaTeX Source', but it should stay there
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:04:41PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Having easy access to the .tex is currently an important means to debug the
> output LyX creates.
The people able and needing to debug .tex are more than capable of
adding a menu entry. The people who wouldn't even think of changing
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 09:58:16AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Why? .tex is the primary output format LyX produces. There hould be a way
> to look at it.
That argument makes no sense. There should also be a way to load DVI
into hexdump and ps into less in an xterm ?
> > Do we really want to k
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 01:26:08PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> You are just too grumpy for your own good...
Maybe.
But I really like to avoid this kind of debate as I find it pretty
frustrating.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, no
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:50:43PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | Or do you explicitly discriminate .tex in order to prove some
>> | "non-dependance"?
>> >
>> | [Which, btw, is not there and won't be there within a reasonable amount of
>> | time]
José Matos wrote:
> > I certainly would like to have it.
>
> We already have the ability to do so, it only takes to add a viewer in
> the format preferences. I have it activated for ASCII (text) output,
> linuxdoc and docbook
Another possibility is to use the custom export dialog:
"emacs $$FName
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:50:43PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Or do you explicitly discriminate .tex in order to prove some
> | "non-dependance"?
> >
> | [Which, btw, is not there and won't be there within a reasonable amount of
> | time]
>
> And therefor we should making the "LyX is an
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:15:08PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> I think it should not be there by default. At least I am trying to
>> lessen our explicit and implict dependance on LaTeX.
>
| The weight of this "LaTeX viewer" is currently _exactly
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 11:35:01AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> I think I got now a fairly good impression of how much time can
> Andre> be wasted without achieving anything. I don't need more
> Andre> education on that topic.
>
> Beware, Andre is grumpy today...
No, I have been gr
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 10:48:06AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: Maybe the item could be moved down in the menu close to
Andre> the latex log file and we could call it 'View LaTeX Source',
Andre> but it should stay there
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:15:08PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I think it should not be there by default. At least I am trying to
> lessen our explicit and implict dependance on LaTeX.
The weight of this "LaTeX viewer" is currently _exactly_ the same as this
of a "Dvi viewer" or a "PDF vie
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Friday 06 December 2002 08:58, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> > Yes, but I think it will prove confusing for many people...
>>
>> Why? .tex is the primary output format LyX produces. There hould be a way
>> to look at it.
>>
>> > Do we really want to keep it?
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 10:48:06AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> Maybe the item could be moved down in the menu close to the
> Andre> latex log file and we could call it 'View LaTeX Source', but it
> Andre> should stay there IMNSHO.
>
> You cannot move it. The list of viewers is buil
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> Maybe the item could be moved down in the menu close to the
Andre> latex log file and we could call it 'View LaTeX Source', but it
Andre> should stay there IMNSHO.
You cannot move it. The list of viewers is built automatically.
JM
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 09:30:49AM +, José Matos wrote:
> > Why? .tex is the primary output format LyX produces. There hould be a way
> > to look at it.
> >
> > > Do we really want to keep it?
> >
> > I certainly would like to have it.
>
> We already have the ability to do so, it only takes
On Friday 06 December 2002 08:58, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Yes, but I think it will prove confusing for many people...
>
> Why? .tex is the primary output format LyX produces. There hould be a way
> to look at it.
>
> > Do we really want to keep it?
>
> I certainly would like to have it.
We alre
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 09:51:36AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> Ever tried finding LaTeX errors using Error boxes that end up
> Andre> miles away from the places where they are supposed to be?
>
> Yes, but I think it will prove confusing for many people...
Why? .tex is the primary
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 02:32:27AM +, John Levon wrote:
>> Where did this come from, and why ?
Andre> Maybe my doing.
Indeed.
Andre> Ever tried finding LaTeX errors using Error boxes that end up
Andre> miles away from the pl
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 02:32:27AM +, John Levon wrote:
> Where did this come from, and why ?
Maybe my doing. I had a similar item for ages in my "personal" copy of LyX.
But maybe not.
Why?
Ever tried finding LaTeX errors using Error boxes that end up miles away
from the places where they ar
On Friday 16 August 2002 1:15 pm, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 04:53:26PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> >>edit/save in less? Is that possible?
> >
> > Type 'v' and $EDITOR pops up.
> >
> >>Even if it is, I would consider
> >>that as an unwanted feature.
> >
> >
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 09:15:13PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> So, if I'm right, Update->LaTeX can never work, it better should go then.
Patch please.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 04:53:26PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
>
>>edit/save in less? Is that possible?
>
>
> Type 'v' and $EDITOR pops up.
>
>
>>Even if it is, I would consider
>>that as an unwanted feature.
>
>
> Then edit you default.ui and you get rid of it. Having o
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 04:53:26PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> edit/save in less? Is that possible?
Type 'v' and $EDITOR pops up.
> Even if it is, I would consider
> that as an unwanted feature.
Then edit you default.ui and you get rid of it. Having one-click-access to
the produced LaTeX is a ve
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 04:12:56PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
>
>>The View-LaTeX is cute, but using xterm+less is too low level.
>>Why not throwing the text of the LaTeX file into a text dialog window, that
>>allows scrolling?
>
>
> Because xterm+less comes for free while a
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 04:12:56PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> The View-LaTeX is cute, but using xterm+less is too low level.
> Why not throwing the text of the LaTeX file into a text dialog window, that
> allows scrolling?
Because xterm+less comes for free while a "text dialog window" needs code.
31 matches
Mail list logo
