Re: Step back for char-style inset

2008-03-21 Thread rgheck
Martin Vermeer wrote: I think I've fixed this. The problem was that decoration_ was defaulting to Classic rather than to Default. Okay thanks! You mean... instead of to Conglomerate? No, there's a Default setting, too, and what Decoration it actually is depends upon what kind of ins

Re: Step back for char-style inset

2008-03-21 Thread Dominik Böhm
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 7:51 PM, rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think I've fixed this. The problem was that decoration_ was defaulting > to Classic rather than to Default. Absolutely, looks much better now! Thanks. Dominik

Re: Step back for char-style inset

2008-03-21 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 02:51:29PM -0400, rgheck wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 09:54:28AM -0400, rgheck wrote: > > > >> Martin Vermeer wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:30:46 -0400 > >>> rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > Domi

Re: Step back for char-style inset

2008-03-21 Thread rgheck
Martin Vermeer wrote: On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 09:54:28AM -0400, rgheck wrote: Martin Vermeer wrote: On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:30:46 -0400 rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dominik Böhm wrote: Hello, I just saw that some of the latest svn commits changed the ren

Re: Step back for char-style inset

2008-03-21 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 09:54:28AM -0400, rgheck wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:30:46 -0400 > > rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> Dominik Böhm wrote: > >> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I just saw that some of the latest svn commits changed the rendering >

Re: Step back for char-style inset

2008-03-18 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:54:28 -0400 rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:30:46 -0400 > > rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> Dominik Böhm wrote: > >> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I just saw that some of the latest svn commits changed th

Re: Step back for char-style inset

2008-03-18 Thread rgheck
Martin Vermeer wrote: On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:30:46 -0400 rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dominik Böhm wrote: Hello, I just saw that some of the latest svn commits changed the rendering behavior of char-style insets. I liked the way they were rendered before (without the handle and p

Re: Step back for char-style inset

2008-03-17 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:30:46 -0400 rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dominik Böhm wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I just saw that some of the latest svn commits changed the rendering > > behavior of char-style insets. I liked the way they were rendered > > before (without the handle and possibility to

Re: Step back for char-style inset

2008-03-17 Thread rgheck
Dominik Böhm wrote: Hello, I just saw that some of the latest svn commits changed the rendering behavior of char-style insets. I liked the way they were rendered before (without the handle and possibility to collapse) much more. Now my text looks like a mess, as I am using char-styles intensivel