Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:30:46 -0400
rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dominik Böhm wrote:
Hello,
I just saw that some of the latest svn commits changed the rendering
behavior of char-style insets. I liked the way they were rendered
before (without the handle and possibility to collapse) much more.
Now my text looks like a mess, as I am using char-styles
intensively. Why did you change the way char-styles work?
Further I think the feature to collapse char-style insets doesn't
make much sense. For example, if you have a char-style "term" that
you use in definitions, the definition using a collapsed char-style
inset would look like:
"A term is a...", though you would have expected "A XXX is a...".
And I think, "A term XXX is a..." also looks really ugly. The old
way was simply better.
I'm going to play around with this a bit and see if I can't improve
things. I agree with you that, for some styles, the "inline" mode
makes a lot more sense.
I would go as far as to call this a bug.
Do we need a new decoration here, or is it just a matter of changing
which one is used?
rh
