On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:30:46 -0400 rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dominik Böhm wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I just saw that some of the latest svn commits changed the rendering > > behavior of char-style insets. I liked the way they were rendered > > before (without the handle and possibility to collapse) much more. > > Now my text looks like a mess, as I am using char-styles > > intensively. Why did you change the way char-styles work? > > > > Further I think the feature to collapse char-style insets doesn't > > make much sense. For example, if you have a char-style "term" that > > you use in definitions, the definition using a collapsed char-style > > inset would look like: > > "A term is a...", though you would have expected "A XXX is a...". > > And I think, "A term XXX is a..." also looks really ugly. The old > > way was simply better. > > > > > I'm going to play around with this a bit and see if I can't improve > things. I agree with you that, for some styles, the "inline" mode > makes a lot more sense. > > rh
I would go as far as to call this a bug. - Martin
