Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-15 Thread Angus Leeming
Michael Schmitt wrote: > Angus, I see that you have added two new translatable messages today. > Could you (or Jean-Marc) please commit my patch to de.po for LyX 1.3.6? I've done so, although patch rejected three of the five blocks in your patch. Since these were just line number changes, I left t

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-14 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> I see you committed them. This is good. Angus> Are you commenting on the content or just the fact that I Angus> committed them? Both. Angus> I've created http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX136, ready fo

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-14 Thread Michael Schmitt
Angus Leeming wrote: I've created http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX136, ready for the release. Suggestions/improvements are very welcome! As the Qt/Win Free guys squash their bugs, I'll upload newer versions of qt-mt.dll too. Angus, I see that you have added two new translatable messages today.

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-14 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I see you committed them. This is good. Are you commenting on the content or just the fact that I committed them? I've created http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX136, ready for the release. Suggestions/improvements are very welcome! As the Qt/Win Free guys squash thei

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-14 Thread Bennett Helm
On Jul 14, 2005, at 10:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> There are a few Qt/Win Free bugs outstanding, but the guys Angus> there are working actively to squash them. I don't see any more Angus> "must-fix" bugs in the LyX 1.3.x source

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-14 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> README.Win32 (attached) is essentially the first few paragraphs Angus> from http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX136pre. A bit of Angus> introductory blurb. Angus> INSTALL.Win32: I attach Michael Schmitt's detailed instructions Angus> on

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-14 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus> There are a few Qt/Win Free bugs outstanding, but the guys > Angus> there are working actively to squash them. I don't see any more > Angus> "must-fix" bugs in the LyX 1.3.x sources. > > OK, so we should try to release today or tomorrow. Is the > documentation

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-14 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> There are a few Qt/Win Free bugs outstanding, but the guys Angus> there are working actively to squash them. I don't see any more Angus> "must-fix" bugs in the LyX 1.3.x sources. OK, so we should try to release today or tomorrow. I

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-14 Thread Angus Leeming
I wrote on 8 July: > I've just updated the list of bugs in LyX 1.3.6 that I know about. See > http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX136pre#known_bugs > Am I missing anything? > My feeling is that we should at least try and address the first two of > these. I do believe we're about done. If I find the en

Re: Fwd: Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-12 Thread Angus Leeming
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > I'm not the only one having problems with the installation of > LyXWin136pre, see below. Unfortunately I'm a bit under stress this week > and wont have time to check what the problem is. My installer version > deletes the folder application data/lyx while uninstalling. But that >

Fwd: Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Hello Angus, I'm not the only one having problems with the installation of LyXWin136pre, see below. Unfortunately I'm a bit under stress this week and wont have time to check what the problem is. My installer version deletes the folder application data/lyx while uninstalling. But that doesn't

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-10 Thread Angus Leeming
Paul A. Rubin wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: >> I've put the resulting installer here: >> http://www.lyx.org/~leeming/lyx_setup_136_paul.exe > > Oh, boy! My own personalized installer. Finally, I'm 'published'. > Will that be its permanent name? No way, José! >> If you can confirm that it fixe

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-09 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Angus Leeming wrote: I've put the resulting installer here: http://www.lyx.org/~leeming/lyx_setup_136_paul.exe Oh, boy! My own personalized installer. Finally, I'm 'published'. Will that be its permanent name? If you can confirm that it fixes your problems then I'll move it onto the wiki

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-08 Thread Angus Leeming
Paul A. Rubin wrote: Just to clarify things a bit: the (approximately) 220 character limit I think I found in yap applies not to the path/filename but to the argument string to the specials command. That argument string includes the literal "PSFile=", the path/filename, bounding box informati

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-08 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Paul A. Rubin wrote: You mean the lyx folder under Application Data, right? Yes. I deleted it and installed version 21 with no problems. On my office machine, which previously had not seen 1.3.6, I did a fresh install, deleted the folder and did another install, all with no problems. Hm

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-08 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Uwe Stöhr wrote: Yes. LyXWin 1.3.6 version 21 doesn't install. I get the error message: LyXTextClassList::Read: unable to find textclass file `'. Exiting. To reproduce this, delete the folder "lyx" in the Win folder "Documents and settings" before you install LyX. (As if you have never insta

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 03:32:17PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > PSfile="F:/lyxdokumente/lyx/tmp/lyx_tmpdir1060a00924/lyx_tmpbuf0/_lyxdokumente_FILENAME.eps > [...] > But anyway, who uses such long filenames? Should we take care about > this? If yes, we could limit the filename length allowed for LyX

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-08 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Uwe Stöhr wrote: Angus Leeming wrote: LyXWin 1.3.6 version 21 doesn't install. I get the error message: LyXTextClassList::Read: unable to find textclass file `'. Exiting. Oh, for [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s sake! Thanks for the report. Now have you any idea why not? Not yet. I need more time to

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-08 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Sven Schreiber schrieb: And it seems it's the ghost_view_ frontend that crashes, not ghostscript itself (8.50 btw), since yap works and somebody said it uses the gs libs. So nothing really for me to do I'm afraid. No gsview don't crash. It simply don't show the image when it is embedded in a .

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-08 Thread Angus Leeming
Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> To test it, I attached a lyx-file... > I forgot it. Now attached. Interesting. Doesn't work on Linux either (older version of gs) where I can't view the DVI file because I get a LyX dialog box popping up with Cannot copy file /home/aleem/Desktop/a...atiger.eps int

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-08 Thread Sven Schreiber
Angus Leeming wrote: > Sven Schreiber wrote: > >>I think Uwe's right, my brief experimentation showed that ghostview >>actually stops working "earlier" (= already with shorter paths) than >>miktex/yap, when used to open an eps-file with a long path directly. >>I even couldn't reproduce the yap-cr

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-08 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Angus Leeming wrote: LyXWin 1.3.6 version 21 doesn't install. I get the error message: LyXTextClassList::Read: unable to find textclass file `'. Exiting. Oh, for [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s sake! Thanks for the report. Now have you any idea why not? Not yet. I need more time to find the bug. Anyw

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-08 Thread Angus Leeming
Sven Schreiber wrote: > I think Uwe's right, my brief experimentation showed that ghostview > actually stops working "earlier" (= already with shorter paths) than > miktex/yap, when used to open an eps-file with a long path directly. > I even couldn't reproduce the yap-crashes with any file with a

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-08 Thread Sven Schreiber
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > I would do this but the Problem with Yap is not a bug in LyX. > Windows has a character limit for filenames. If you use a filename with > 220 chars, export the LyX document to .tex, run then LaTeX, and open the > created file with yap no crash occurs. If you view the DVI from

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-08 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus> My feeling is that we should at least try and address > Angus> thfirst two of these. I've been asked to put together > Angus> a minimal test case for the YAP problem and to submit > Angus> it to the MiKTeX bug tracker. I'm hoping that this does > Angus> the tri

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

2005-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> My feeling is that we should at least try and address the first Angus> two of these. I've been asked to put together a minimal test Angus> case for the YAP problem and to submit it to the MiKTeX bug Angus> tracker. I'm hoping that t