Re: Release 2

2011-03-14 Thread Joost Verburg
"Pavel Sanda" wrote in message news:20110314000522.gl25...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz... Michal wrote: While I still don't know why msvc2008 is no longer recommended, it i think the reason is that Joost (who was recently working on new installer) is simply using and testing with 2010. A

Re: Release 2

2011-03-13 Thread Pavel Sanda
Michal wrote: > While I still don't know why msvc2008 is no longer recommended, it i think the reason is that Joost (who was recently working on new installer) is simply using and testing with 2010. pavel

Re: Release 2

2011-03-13 Thread Michal
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:47:37 +0100 Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > [...] > I don't know what scripts that are (was that the scons support ?). > > If you use CMake you can just generate solution files for vs2008 and > compile. > Nothing really changed AFAIK. While I still don't know why msvc2

Re: Release 2

2011-03-12 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 06:03:57AM +0100, Michal wrote: > On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:39:44 +0100 > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > I regularly build a native MinGW version using autotools. I don't > > think I can help you, though, as I actually cross-compile it using > > Cygwin. > Well, I think you

Re: Release 2

2011-03-11 Thread Michal
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:47:37 +0100 Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > [...] > I don't know what scripts that are (was that the scons support ?). > > If you use CMake you can just generate solution files for vs2008 and > compile. > Nothing really changed AFAIK. I've just noticed, that there are

Re: Release 2

2011-03-11 Thread Michal
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:39:44 +0100 Enrico Forestieri wrote: > I regularly build a native MinGW version using autotools. I don't > think I can help you, though, as I actually cross-compile it using > Cygwin. Well, I think you can help, and I'm blatantly assuming that you'll have enough time and

Re: Release 2

2011-03-11 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 11-3-2011 19:17, Michal schreef: On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:56:36 +0100 Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: You can still use vs2008. Isn't it working anymore for you ? The instructions for vs2008 are gone from 2.0.0rc1, also at least the files development\Win32\packaging\build_msvc*.bat were

Re: Release 2

2011-03-11 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 07:17:25PM +0100, Michal wrote: > Cygwin is not a solution for me, because it is non-native. Also I > have only minimal experience in compiling there. I regularly build a native MinGW version using autotools. I don't think I can help you, though, as I actually cross-co

Re: Release 2

2011-03-11 Thread Michal
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:56:36 +0100 Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > You can still use vs2008. > > Isn't it working anymore for you ? The instructions for vs2008 are gone from 2.0.0rc1, also at least the files development\Win32\packaging\build_msvc*.bat were removed. I thought that was for

Re: Release 2

2011-03-11 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 11-3-2011 4:04, Michal schreef: For 2.0.0beta4 I've used vs2008 express, as suggested in the INSTALL.Win32 file from tarball, along with precompiled Qt 4.7.1 binaries. Everything worked out of the box, which is quite a feat, considering the size of the codebase. For reasons unknown

Re: Release 2

2011-03-10 Thread Michal
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 11:44:17 -0600 Nick Early wrote: > Dear Michal, > > First, thank you so much for posting the installer file for LyX beta 4 > last month! It worked perfectly. Beware http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7315, though. > I spent quite a while yesterday trying to figure out how to