> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Both of these sound fine to me: No document (is) open No
Angus> documents (are) open
Angus> I think I side with Richard on this one. I too prefer the
Angus> singular.
Thanks for your comment. I committed a version with singular fo
Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What is best? We have "No documents open!" now, the principle of least
> > effort would advise to keep it like that...
> >
> I guess I prefer the singular. The plural suggests that documentS should
> have been open---that this was the expected situati
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 07:48:41AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Lars> | I prefer "No document open!"
>
> Lars> Sounds strange. Is that even english?
>
> Lars> I thought that 'No' usually required plural (unless you want
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Richard> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Lars> | I prefer "No document open!"
>
> Lars> Sounds strange. Is that even english?
>
> Lars> I thought that 'No' usually required plural (unless you want to
> Lars> give it a different meaning.)
>
>>> I do not know... S
> "Richard" == Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Lars> | I prefer "No document open!"
>>
Lars> Sounds strange. Is that even english?
>>
Lars> I thought that 'No' usually required plural (unless you want to
Lars> give it a different meaning.)
>> I do
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Lars> | I prefer "No document open!"
>
> Lars> Sounds strange. Is that even english?
>
> Lars> I thought that 'No' usually required plural (unless you want to
> Lars> give it a different meaning.)
>
> I do not know... So where are the native English speakers?
>
"No
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Lars> | I prefer "No document open!"
>>
Lars> Sounds strange. Is that even english?
>>
Lars> I thought that 'No' usually
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> | I prefer "No document open!"
Lars> Sounds strange. Is that even english?
Lars> I thought that 'No' usually required plural (unless you want to
Lars> give it a different meaning.)
I do not know... So
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> | I prefer "No document open!"
Lars> Sounds strange. Is that even english?
Lars> I thought that 'No' usually required plural (unless you want to
Lars> give it a different meaning.)
I do not know... So where are the native Eng
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Abdelrazak> I like this, thanks :-)
|
| Other comments? Jose, shall I apply?
|
| >> (shall I use the plural and Upcase, like in the first message?).
|
| Abdelrazak> I pers
Elazar Leibovich wrote:
On 5/29/07, Dov Feldstern
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Elazar Leibovich wrote:
> On 5/29/07, Dov Feldstern
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Elazar Leibovich wrote:
>> > The inset makes it crystal clear and intuitive as to where the next
>> > character will be placed. It has
On Tuesday 29 May 2007 22:18:29 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> You mean "No document open!" and "No branch in document!"?
Yes.
> JMarc
--
José Abílio
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> On Tuesday 29 May 2007 22:05:41 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> What shall I do about the language?
José> I like your choices. :-)
You mean "No document open!" and "No branch in document!"?
JMarc
On Tuesday 29 May 2007 22:05:41 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What shall I do about the language?
I like your choices. :-)
> JMarc
--
José Abílio
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> On Tuesday 29 May 2007 14:35:04 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Other comments? Jose, shall I apply?
José> It seems OK. I like it. :-)
What shall I do about the language?
JMarc
On 5/29/07, Dov Feldstern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Elazar Leibovich wrote:
> On 5/29/07, Dov Feldstern
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Elazar Leibovich wrote:
>> > The inset makes it crystal clear and intuitive as to where the next
>> > character will be placed. It has it's problems though.
>>
Elazar Leibovich wrote:
On 5/29/07, Dov Feldstern
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Elazar Leibovich wrote:
> The inset makes it crystal clear and intuitive as to where the next
> character will be placed. It has it's problems though.
> I was aware to the F12 key, but I thought (and still think) it's
>
1) Redundacy. Before, I had to remember and take care of two
variables, Lyx language and keyboard language. Now I just need to
remember the keyboard language.
2) Clearance. No user expect the application to have a language
specific implementation, moreover - how would he guess it's F12? So
that's
Elazar Leibovich wrote:
The inset makes it crystal clear and intuitive as to where the next
character will be placed. It has it's problems though.
I was aware to the F12 key, but I thought (and still think) it's
preferable not to use it, as now Lyx recieves input from the cursor.
But what's so
Fair question.
I edited quite a bit of text. My seminar, the works at the crypto
course. Some other works in various courses. Maybe not as much as you
did.
The inset makes it crystal clear and intuitive as to where the next
character will be placed. It has it's problems though.
I was aware to the
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:54:40AM +0300, Elazar Leibovich wrote:
> I'm having a new idea for RTL in Lyx. Why won't we put RTL (or LTR in
> RTL paragraph) content in insets? that way, it'll be intuitive for the
> user to change the directionality (step out of the inset, like you do
> in math), and
Elazar Leibovich wrote:
I'm having a new idea for RTL in Lyx. Why won't we put RTL (or LTR in
RTL paragraph) content in insets? that way, it'll be intuitive for the
user to change the directionality (step out of the inset, like you do
in math), and we can trigger new RTL inset insertion upon inpu
On Tuesday 29 May 2007 14:35:04 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Other comments? Jose, shall I apply?
It seems OK. I like it. :-)
--
José Abílio
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> I like this, thanks :-)
Other comments? Jose, shall I apply?
>> (shall I use the plural and Upcase, like in the first message?).
Abdelrazak> I personally like the non plural, non Upcase style:
Abdelrazak> + _("No D
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
It would make sense if the Branch menu contained a disabled "No
branch defined" menu entry.
Abdelrazak> Is this possible with current architecture?
Yes, like this
I like this, thanks :-)
(shall I
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It would make sense if the Branch menu contained a disabled "No
>> branch defined" menu entry.
Abdelrazak> Is this possible with current architecture?
Yes, like this (shall I use the plural and Upcase, like in the first
mess
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Empty menus are bad.
Abdelrazak> Indiscoverable features are bad.
Features are bad anyway.
If you insist, the patch would be as follow, but after trying it, I do
not see how it would help _anyone_.
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Empty menus are bad.
Abdelrazak> Indiscoverable features are bad.
Features are bad anyway.
If you insist, the patch would be as follow, but after trying it, I do
not see how it would help _anyone_.
It would make sense if t
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Sent too fast sorry:
Abdelrazak> You can create a Branch in the Document Settings dialog
Abdelrazak> (Branches). Then this branch will be available in the
Abdelrazak> Insert->Branch submenu.
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Sent too fast sorry:
Abdelrazak> You can create a Branch in the Document Settings dialog
Abdelrazak> (Branches). Then this branch will be available in the
Abdelrazak> Insert->Branch submenu.
Abdelrazak> By the way, I
On 5/29/07, Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Elazar Leibovich wrote:
> On 5/29/07, Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Elazar Leibovich wrote:
>> > I'm having a new idea for RTL in Lyx. Why won't we put RTL (or LTR in
>> > RTL paragraph) content in insets? that way, it'l
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Elazar Leibovich wrote:
On 5/29/07, Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Elazar Leibovich wrote:
> I'm having a new idea for RTL in Lyx. Why won't we put RTL (or LTR in
> RTL paragraph) content in insets? that way, it'll be intuitive for the
> user to change the
Elazar Leibovich wrote:
On 5/29/07, Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Elazar Leibovich wrote:
> I'm having a new idea for RTL in Lyx. Why won't we put RTL (or LTR in
> RTL paragraph) content in insets? that way, it'll be intuitive for the
> user to change the directionality (step out
On 5/29/07, Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Elazar Leibovich wrote:
> I'm having a new idea for RTL in Lyx. Why won't we put RTL (or LTR in
> RTL paragraph) content in insets? that way, it'll be intuitive for the
> user to change the directionality (step out of the inset, like you do
Elazar Leibovich wrote:
I'm having a new idea for RTL in Lyx. Why won't we put RTL (or LTR in
RTL paragraph) content in insets? that way, it'll be intuitive for the
user to change the directionality (step out of the inset, like you do
in math), and we can trigger new RTL inset insertion upon inpu
35 matches
Mail list logo
