>>>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It would make sense if the Branch menu contained a disabled "No
>> branch defined" menu entry.
Abdelrazak> Is this possible with current architecture?
Yes, like this (shall I use the plural and Upcase, like in the first
message?).
JMarc
Index: lib/ui/stdmenus.inc
===================================================================
--- lib/ui/stdmenus.inc (révision 18552)
+++ lib/ui/stdmenus.inc (copie de travail)
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ Menuset
Submenu "List / TOC|i" "insert_toc"
Submenu "Float|a" "insert_float"
Submenu "Note|N" "insert_note"
- OptSubmenu "Branch|B" "insert_branches"
+ Submenu "Branch|B" "insert_branches"
Submenu "File|e" "insert_file"
Item "Box" "box-insert Frameless"
Separator
Index: src/MenuBackend.cpp
===================================================================
--- src/MenuBackend.cpp (révision 18552)
+++ src/MenuBackend.cpp (copie de travail)
@@ -808,10 +808,20 @@ void expandToolbars(Menu & tomenu)
void expandBranches(Menu & tomenu, Buffer const * buf)
{
- if (!buf)
+ if (!buf) {
+ tomenu.add(MenuItem(MenuItem::Command,
+ _("No Documents Open!"),
+ FuncRequest(LFUN_NOACTION)));
return;
+ }
BufferParams const & params = buf->getMasterBuffer()->params();
+ if (params.branchlist().empty()) {
+ tomenu.add(MenuItem(MenuItem::Command,
+ _("No branch in document!"),
+ FuncRequest(LFUN_NOACTION)));
+ return;
+ }
BranchList::const_iterator cit = params.branchlist().begin();
BranchList::const_iterator end = params.branchlist().end();
