Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Stefan Schimanski schrieb:
>
>> Otherwise the format is the same as before, only that now optional
>> arguments are allowed.
>
> So we need a fileformat change with a revert routine that deletes the
> arguments. This should be easy to do. I'll have a look wh
Stefan Schimanski schrieb:
Otherwise the format is the same as before, only that now optional arguments are
allowed.
So we need a fileformat change with a revert routine that deletes the arguments. This should be easy
to do. I'll have a look when I'm testing.
regards Uwe
Am 07.10.2007 um 20:06 schrieb Asger Ottar Alstrup:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
I would be happy to hear some comments or reports how it performs.
Feel free to ask if something is unclear in the code. What is the
way to proceed now?
How did you test this yourself? How ready is it to release
Am 07.10.2007 um 20:05 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
> I would be happy to hear some comments or reports how it performs.
I propose that you create a LyX-file that described how to use the
new features. If possible, add some examples to it. I can then test
if it works as expected and report you bugs.
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
I would be happy to hear some comments or reports how it performs. Feel
free to ask if something is unclear in the code. What is the way to
proceed now?
How did you test this yourself? How ready is it to release quality? Did
you write documentation for the feature?
> I would be happy to hear some comments or reports how it performs.
I propose that you create a LyX-file that described how to use the new features. If possible, add
some examples to it. I can then test if it works as expected and report you bugs. While writing the
docmentation you'll surely s
Nilam Gaikwad wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm Neelam From India. And I want to participate in porting LyX in
> Linux for indian languages.
> My first porting priority is for Tamil & Sanskrit languages.
>
> On my home PC Linux 8.0 is installed. QT and tetex are already
> installed. When I tried to insta
> Do you think it would be difficult to "port" xfig to work under windows9*?
> Where I could get informations on how to do it by my self?
We succeeded about two years ago in compiling xfig 3.2(?) for Windows
using Cygwin19. Unfortunately, I lost the resulting binary.
I remember it was a major
At 05:50 PM 1/20/99 +0200, you wrote:
>> I have some good news which you might like to hear. I got around to trying
>> to port LyX (pre 6) to WinNT using the latest Cygwin library. The previous
>This is great! One more showcase for free software.
Thank you. I am very pleased I am able to contri
Once these issues get settled,
would it be possible to make an announcment regarding these matters to the
users and announcment lists.
Roland
On 20-Jan-99 Andre' Poenitz wrote:
>> > By the way, I would VERY much like to hear from somebody who tried to use
>> > the binary.
>
> Oki, I tried it. F
> > By the way, I would VERY much like to hear from somebody who tried to use
> > the binary.
Oki, I tried it. First thing to say: I have no idea of WinNT but 10
WinNT-Boxes just round the corner.
Downloading works quite well, unzip too.
Configure did not run in the first place. I got a 'permis
> Hi all,
>
> I have some good news which you might like to hear. I got around to trying
> to port LyX (pre 6) to WinNT using the latest Cygwin library. The previous
> library was pretty bothersome. I was able to configure and compile LyX
> without ANY change to LyX sourcefiles or the configurati
Hello,
> Hi all,
>
> I have some good news which you might like to hear. I got around to trying
> to port LyX (pre 6) to WinNT using the latest Cygwin library. The previous
> library was pretty bothersome. I was able to configure and compile LyX
> without ANY change to LyX sourcefiles or the co
> Will ever lyx be ported to GTK+?
> Now lyx uses xforms but they are not very standard for the linux
> environment, so are there any plans for this port?
Yes, and help is very welcome!
Un saludo.
Alejandro
14 matches
Mail list logo
