Re: Note on size of context menus

2010-12-09 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Liviu Andronic wrote: >> As for the tabular items themselves, personally I would prefer that it >> stays as it is. > > you mean this 2 column version? > No, no. I was talking only about the tabular-specific items: the menu present in beta1, fr

Re: Note on size of context menus

2010-12-09 Thread Pavel Sanda
Liviu Andronic wrote: > As for the tabular items themselves, personally I would prefer that it > stays as it is. you mean this 2 column version? p

Re: Note on size of context menus

2010-12-09 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: >> That's a pretty good idea. Another would be to use more submenus on the >> tabular menu. > > i feel that once you need tree-like structure in context menu the whole point > to have something quickly in hand via context me

Re: Note on size of context menus

2010-12-09 Thread Pavel Sanda
Richard Heck wrote: > That's a pretty good idea. Another would be to use more submenus on the > tabular menu. i feel that once you need tree-like structure in context menu the whole point to have something quickly in hand via context menu is lost and we can safely return back to settings dialog o

Re: Note on size of context menus

2010-12-09 Thread Richard Heck
On 12/09/2010 05:23 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: hi, dont have a netbook to test but i bet that our current tabular context menu have no chance to get inside the monitor after last changes... I can confirm. I have a 12 inch netbook, and beta1 c

Re: Note on size of context menus

2010-12-09 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > hi, > dont have a netbook to test but i bet that our current tabular context menu > have no chance > to get inside the monitor after last changes... > I can confirm. I have a 12 inch netbook, and beta1 c-menu was fine but beta2 tabular c-menu c

Re: Note on size of context menus

2010-12-09 Thread Edwin Leuven
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Go for it. i once did, but i have some vague memory that it was a bit controversial so in the end we decided to stick to what we had i do think that the menu's are too daunting for most perhaps i'll try to dig up these old threads over the xmas holiday to see wh

Re: Note on size of context menus

2010-12-09 Thread Pavel Sanda
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Go for it. yay i see the flames :) > > Op 9 dec 2010 22:07 schreef "Edwin Leuven" : > > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > I think these menus are getting to large to be ac... > and would benefit from a bit of reorganisation > > and then some fresh icons on top of

Re: Note on size of context menus

2010-12-09 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Go for it. Op 9 dec 2010 22:07 schreef "Edwin Leuven" : Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I think these menus are getting to large to be ac... and would benefit from a bit of reorganisation and then some fresh icons on top of it ... ed.

Re: Note on size of context menus

2010-12-09 Thread Edwin Leuven
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I think these menus are getting to large to be actually useful. and would benefit from a bit of reorganisation and then some fresh icons on top of it ... ed.

Re: Note on size of context menus

2010-12-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 09/12/2010 21:32, Pavel Sanda a écrit : hi, dont have a netbook to test but i bet that our current tabular context menu have no chance to get inside the monitor after last changes... I think these menus are getting to large to be actually useful. JMarc