On Fri, 4 May 2001, Baruch Even wrote:
> For my defence I only have the fact the only LFUN_HELP_OPEN says in
> LyXAction.C that it takes arguments, the others have no mention of it in
> their definition.
>
> Why is this inconsistency? If Argument is unneeded, remove it. If it's
> needed why are
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 04-May-2001 John Levon wrote:
>
> > Also spellcheck needs doing, but I'm not sure about stepping on Juergen's
> > toes if he finds time to have a go at tabular spellcheck + find/replace.
>
> Please keep on reminding me. I'm quite busy at the mome
* Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010504 15:18]:
> Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | * Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010504 14:28]:
> | > Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >
> | > | > The intention is that in the minibuffer you will not be allowed to
> |
Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| * Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010504 14:28]:
| > Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | > The intention is that in the minibuffer you will not be allowed to
| > | > enter "free text" strings. i.e. lfuns with arguments, but will _o
> This is fine, the current lfun's do not require arguments so this
> transitional flaw is of no concern.
math-macro-arg required an argument last time I looked...
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010504 14:28]:
> Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > The intention is that in the minibuffer you will not be allowed to
> | > enter "free text" strings. i.e. lfuns with arguments, but will _only_
> | > be allowed to enter the lfun. If the lfu
Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > The intention is that in the minibuffer you will not be allowed to
| > enter "free text" strings. i.e. lfuns with arguments, but will _only_
| > be allowed to enter the lfun. If the lfun requires an argument it will
| > be asked for (or more than one).
* Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010504 13:47]:
> Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > | We should try to have the next version stabilized soon so that our users
> | > | who want something better than 1.1.5fixN will be able to upgrade. The
> | > | tables code in 1.1.6fix2 wil
Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | We should try to have the next version stabilized soon so that our users
| > | who want something better than 1.1.5fixN will be able to upgrade. The
| > | tables code in 1.1.6fix2 will not have all fixes and we need to
| > | stabilize that before we g
* Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010504 12:58]:
> Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | * Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010503 18:49]:
> | > My immediate todo list:
> | > - lists of floats
> | > - try out dymmy LyXView/BufferView
> | > - try ou
On 04-May-2001 John Levon wrote:
> Also spellcheck needs doing, but I'm not sure about stepping on Juergen's
> toes if he finds time to have a go at tabular spellcheck + find/replace.
Please keep on reminding me. I'm quite busy at the moment with various
projects (most of them I get money for ;
On 3 May 2001, Lars Gullik [iso-8859-1] Bjønnes wrote:
> btw. The minibuffer is almost ready for GUII, should now be quite easy
> to split in gui/non-gui.
hoped so, I was going to have a go at this one.
Also spellcheck needs doing, but I'm not sure about stepping on Juergen's
toes if he finds t
Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| * Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010503 18:49]:
| > My immediate todo list:
| > - lists of floats
| > - try out dymmy LyXView/BufferView
| > - try out the visitor pattern on the inset write methods.
|
| Even though I was
* Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010503 18:49]:
> My immediate todo list:
> - lists of floats
> - try out dymmy LyXView/BufferView
> - try out the visitor pattern on the inset write methods.
Even though I was the one who raised the third point, wouldn't it be
bet
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 3 May 2001, Lars Gullik [iso-8859-1] Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > - try out dymmy LyXView/BufferView
|
| can you expand on this for the slow ones in the audience ?
The intention was long ago to have a base LyXView and have child
classes for gui, lyx-
On 3 May 2001, Lars Gullik [iso-8859-1] Bjønnes wrote:
> - try out dymmy LyXView/BufferView
can you expand on this for the slow ones in the audience ?
thanks
john
--
"Thought you saw your sig ? I stole it."
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:24:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Unless I get a lot of protests I will begin to slowly cleanup the
> NEW_INSETS ifdef mess.
>
> I will begin with LyXParagraph and progressto LyXText.
> I will leave code that is particularly interesting or that is not
> qui
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > I know of only a couple of problems:
| >
| > - floats support are a bit lacking, specially algoritm will
| > have problems.
|
| does this also include the fact that getTocList() doesn't work (generating
| no contents for the dialog to
On 14 Jan 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>
> I have removed all !NEW_INSETS cruft from the sources in the
> BRANCH_new_insets branch. It seems to me that it works very well but
> I'd like to have some more testers.
>
> At least the Userguide loads nicely.
>
> I know of only a couple of pr
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 02:30:55AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> I have removed all !NEW_INSETS cruft from the sources in the
> BRANCH_new_insets branch. It seems to me that it works very well but
> I'd like to have some more testers.
>
> SGML might also be a problem.
I know, I will w
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> So l[TOC_LOF] et al are never filled What am I missing ?
With new insets, floats are moved to a new inset structure, so the
code should be rewritten to handle these float insets.
JMarc
21 matches
Mail list logo
