> The TeXLive package manager cannot do on-the-fly-installations yet. OTOH,
> TeXLive directly accesses CTAN, while MikTeX is bound to its own repository.
> So I guess TeXLive is slightly more up to date (and more complete).
MiKTeX's packages are automatically created by a script when CTAN got a
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 09:44:42PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Sounds promising:
http://blog.miktex.org/post/2008/09/MiKTeX-28-Beta-1-for-GNULinux.aspx
Has anybody tested this yet? If yes, Christian Schenk, the MiKTeX
developer, is interested to get feedback.
No, and I would
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> TeXlive 2008 has a package manager too. I do not know the difference
> between the two
> distributions now.
The TeXLive package manager cannot do on-the-fly-installations yet. OTOH,
TeXLive directly accesses CTAN, while MikTeX is bound to its own repository.
So I
Andre Poenitz wrote:
What's wrong with the version coming with my distribution?
Why do you ask? Nothing is wrong, MiKTeX is just an alternative for
TeXLive. It is more user friendly than TeXLive with it's package manager
and the install missing packages on the fly feature.
So the main advant
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:10:13PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Andre Poenitz schrieb:
>
>> What's wrong with the version coming with my distribution?
>
> Why do you ask? Nothing is wrong, MiKTeX is just an alternative for
> TeXLive. It is more user friendly than TeXLive with it's package manager
>
Le 21 sept. 08 à 22:10, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
Why do you ask? Nothing is wrong, MiKTeX is just an alternative for
TeXLive. It is more user friendly than TeXLive with it's package
manager and the install missing packages on the fly feature.
TeXlive 2008 has a package manager too. I do not know
Andre Poenitz schrieb:
What's wrong with the version coming with my distribution?
Why do you ask? Nothing is wrong, MiKTeX is just an alternative for TeXLive. It is more user
friendly than TeXLive with it's package manager and the install missing packages on the fly feature.
Test it out or
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 09:44:42PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Sounds promising:
> http://blog.miktex.org/post/2008/09/MiKTeX-28-Beta-1-for-GNULinux.aspx
>
> Has anybody tested this yet? If yes, Christian Schenk, the MiKTeX
> developer, is interested to get feedback.
No, and I would not know why I
