Re: LYX_INSTALL and CPack in cmake

2010-07-21 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag 22 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel: > Am Montag, den 19.07.2010, 07:08 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > Where can I find explanations of these new options? At least > > > LYX_CPACK, LYX_INSTALL, and LYX_NLS are opaque to me. > > > > > > BH > > > > This is all in flux now. Some very

Re: LYX_INSTALL and CPack in cmake

2010-07-21 Thread Peter Kümmel
Am Montag, den 19.07.2010, 07:08 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > > Where can I find explanations of these new options? At least > > LYX_CPACK, LYX_INSTALL, and LYX_NLS are opaque to me. > > > > BH > > This is all in flux now. Some very short explanations can be seen with > "make edit_cac

Re: LYX_INSTALL and CPack in cmake

2010-07-18 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Montag 19 Juli 2010 schrieb BH: > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel: > >> Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 22:33 +0200 schrieb Stephan Witt: > >> > Am 18.07.2010 um 22:21 schrieb Peter Kümmel: > >> > > Seems I've lost the fight agai

Re: LYX_INSTALL and CPack in cmake

2010-07-18 Thread BH
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel: >> Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 22:33 +0200 schrieb Stephan Witt: >> > Am 18.07.2010 um 22:21 schrieb Peter Kümmel: >> > > Seems I've lost the fight against the default ON of LYX_INSTALL. >> > > >>

Re: LYX_INSTALL and CPack in cmake

2010-07-18 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel: > Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 22:33 +0200 schrieb Stephan Witt: > > Am 18.07.2010 um 22:21 schrieb Peter Kümmel: > > > Seems I've lost the fight against the default ON of LYX_INSTALL. > > > > > > Peter > > > > Now I cannot create the CMake project any

Re: LYX_INSTALL and CPack in cmake

2010-07-18 Thread Peter Kümmel
Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 22:33 +0200 schrieb Stephan Witt: > Am 18.07.2010 um 22:21 schrieb Peter Kümmel: > > > Seems I've lost the fight against the default ON of LYX_INSTALL. > > > > Peter > > Now I cannot create the CMake project anymore because of missing > AIKSAURUSLIB... Same here. Y

Re: LYX_INSTALL and CPack in cmake

2010-07-18 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 18.07.2010 um 22:33 schrieb Stephan Witt: > Am 18.07.2010 um 22:21 schrieb Peter Kümmel: > >> Seems I've lost the fight against the default ON of LYX_INSTALL. >> >> Peter > > Now I cannot create the CMake project anymore because of missing > AIKSAURUSLIB... To be more verbose: % sh mkcm

Re: LYX_INSTALL and CPack in cmake

2010-07-18 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 18.07.2010 um 22:21 schrieb Peter Kümmel: > Seems I've lost the fight against the default ON of LYX_INSTALL. > > Peter Now I cannot create the CMake project anymore because of missing AIKSAURUSLIB... Stephan

Re: LYX_INSTALL and CPack in cmake

2010-07-18 Thread Peter Kümmel
Seems I've lost the fight against the default ON of LYX_INSTALL. Peter

Re: LYX_INSTALL and CPack in cmake

2010-07-18 Thread Peter Kümmel
Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 13:21 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel: > > Is it possible to move all package/install code > > into a single block within the cmake file? We should > > really try to cleanup this file. > > > > Peter > > I like the install comm

Re: LYX_INSTALL and CPack in cmake

2010-07-18 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel: > Is it possible to move all package/install code > into a single block within the cmake file? We should > really try to cleanup this file. > > Peter I like the install commands at the same place, as are the create defintions :( But yes, it is not con

Re: LYX_INSTALL and CPack in cmake

2010-07-18 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel: > Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel: > >> Kornel Benko wrote: > > ... > > > >>> Even if LYX_NLS were set? > >> > >> Ah, shouldn't we then include CPack only when LYX_NLS is set? > > > > After a second thought, I thi

Re: LYX_INSTALL and CPack in cmake

2010-07-18 Thread Peter Kümmel
Peter Kümmel wrote: > Kornel Benko wrote: >> Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel: >>> Kornel Benko wrote: >> ... Even if LYX_NLS were set? >>> Ah, shouldn't we then include CPack only when LYX_NLS is set? >>> >> After a second thought, I think that having LYX_CPACK option is ok. >> >>

Re: LYX_INSTALL and CPack in cmake

2010-07-18 Thread Peter Kümmel
Is it possible to move all package/install code into a single block within the cmake file? We should really try to cleanup this file. Peter

Re: LYX_INSTALL and CPack in cmake

2010-07-18 Thread Peter Kümmel
Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel: >> Kornel Benko wrote: > ... >>> Even if LYX_NLS were set? >> Ah, shouldn't we then include CPack only when LYX_NLS is set? >> > > After a second thought, I think that having LYX_CPACK option is ok. > > This would _imply_ LYX_INS

Re: LYX_INSTALL and CPack in cmake

2010-07-18 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel: > Kornel Benko wrote: ... > > Even if LYX_NLS were set? > > Ah, shouldn't we then include CPack only when LYX_NLS is set? > After a second thought, I think that having LYX_CPACK option is ok. This would _imply_ LYX_INSTALL , not the other way. We c

Re: LYX_INSTALL and CPack in cmake

2010-07-17 Thread Peter Kümmel
Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel: >> Kornel Benko wrote: >>> Am Samstag 17 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel: Kornel Benko wrote: > Peter, why is now > > include(CPack) > > allowed ony if "LYX_INSTALL" is set? Is it a problem to set LYX

Re: LYX_INSTALL and CPack in cmake

2010-07-17 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel: > Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Samstag 17 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel: > >> Kornel Benko wrote: > >>> Peter, why is now > >>> > >>> include(CPack) > >>> > >>> allowed ony if "LYX_INSTALL" is set? > >> > >> Is it a problem to set LYX_INSTALL when p

Re: LYX_INSTALL and CPack in cmake

2010-07-17 Thread Peter Kümmel
Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Samstag 17 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel: >> Kornel Benko wrote: >>> Peter, why is now >>> >>> include(CPack) Is it possible to check for nist on Windows, or to enable zip by default? Joost, have you tried to build your installer with cmake. Maybe it is possible to t

Re: LYX_INSTALL and CPack in cmake

2010-07-17 Thread Peter Kümmel
Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Samstag 17 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel: >> Kornel Benko wrote: >>> Peter, why is now >>> >>> include(CPack) >>> >>> allowed ony if "LYX_INSTALL" is set? >> Is it a problem to set LYX_INSTALL when packaging >> is required? Then we could a a new option. > > Please do

Re: LYX_INSTALL and CPack in cmake

2010-07-17 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Samstag 17 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel: > Kornel Benko wrote: > > Peter, why is now > > > > include(CPack) > > > > allowed ony if "LYX_INSTALL" is set? > > Is it a problem to set LYX_INSTALL when packaging > is required? Then we could a a new option. Please do not. We already have man

Re: LYX_INSTALL and CPack in cmake

2010-07-17 Thread Peter Kümmel
Kornel Benko wrote: > Peter, why is now > include(CPack) > allowed ony if "LYX_INSTALL" is set? Is it a problem to set LYX_INSTALL when packaging is required? Then we could a a new option. > > Now is the belowed call > make package > crippled. > > IMHO It does not harm to have in un