On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 08:35:03AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > What about "Enspace (kern 0.5 em)", maybe placed after QQuad, such that
> > the casual user would choose "Enskip (0.5 em)", which comes first?
> > The expert user would be informed that this is a ker
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 08:35:03AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > What about "Enspace (kern 0.5 em)", maybe placed after QQuad, such that
> > the casual user would choose "Enskip (0.5 em)", which comes first?
> > The expert user would be informed that this is a kern
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> What about "Enspace (kern 0.5 em)", maybe placed after QQuad, such that
> the casual user would choose "Enskip (0.5 em)", which comes first?
> The expert user would be informed that this is a kern spacing, so that he
> knows that this could also be a vertical space in som
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 04:08:36PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Given that this is the first time that Enspace appears in a menu,
> > why not simply (1) renaming "Enspace" to "Enskip", (2) make sure that
> > when "protect" is selected "\hspace*{0.5em}" is produce
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Given that this is the first time that Enspace appears in a menu,
> why not simply (1) renaming "Enspace" to "Enskip", (2) make sure that
> when "protect" is selected "\hspace*{0.5em}" is produced instead of
> "\enspace", and (3) leaving "space-insert enspace" as it is bu
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 03:21:16PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > To be frank, I never noticed it. Do you mean that somewhere in 1.4 there's
> > an option to insert "Enspace" which really translates to \enskip?
>
> No. "space-insert enskip" inserts an enskip, wher
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> To be frank, I never noticed it. Do you mean that somewhere in 1.4 there's
> an option to insert "Enspace" which really translates to \enskip?
No. "space-insert enskip" inserts an enskip, whereas "space-insert enspace"
inserts an enspace.
> In this case it would simply
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 02:44:15PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > I think that you misunderstood \enskip and \enspace. They both have a
> > length of 0.5em, but \enskip always inserts horizontal space, whereas
> > \enspace inserts horizontal space when in horizonta
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 02:15:43PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:09:30AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
[...]
> > AFAIU, enspace and enskip are of the same length (a half em), only one is
> > protected, the other isn't. That's why I used only one combo entry while
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> I think that you misunderstood \enskip and \enspace. They both have a
> length of 0.5em, but \enskip always inserts horizontal space, whereas
> \enspace inserts horizontal space when in horizontal mode but vertical
> space when in vertical mode. Try the attached latex sni
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:09:30AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > In the new hspace inset (thanks Jürgen) one of the possible spaces
> > is labeled "Enspace (0.5em)" but it really inserts \enskip.
> > This could be okay by itself, as \enskip is defined similarly to
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> In the new hspace inset (thanks Jürgen) one of the possible spaces
> is labeled "Enspace (0.5em)" but it really inserts \enskip.
> This could be okay by itself, as \enskip is defined similarly to \quad
> (inserted by "Quad (1em)") and \qquad (inserted by "QQuad (2em)", i.
12 matches
Mail list logo
