On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Rex Eastbourne wrote:
place where I could see the most improvement is the website,
specifically the navigation, documentation, and look and feel.
Hi Rex,
I certainly agree with the above. (IMHO this also holds for the wiki,
although I'm not sure you're referring to it sp
Dominik Böhm wrote:
I would go one step further as the website doesn't only look somehow
confusing. Some might say that the design of the page is well
established, I would say that it just looks old and needs
refurbishment. I just had a look at the internet archive
(http://web.archive.org/web/*/h
> As far as other ways of contributing: I don't know C++, but I am pretty
> proficient in Python, which I see is used for some aspects of LyX. Are there
> any small Python tasks that are particularly in need of getting done?
I would suggest that you first check out lyx-devel and compile lyx by
> am interested in helping out with the project. I am interested in finding
> out how I can be of the most help given my skill set and interests.
subscribe to devel list, read thread you are interested in, the tasks
will appear by themselves ;)
> I know all the information is there in the website
"Dominik Böhm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am pretty sure that LyX could reach a lot more users if the website
> was professional, appealing and well structured (latter would include
> the download link on the home page).
The fact that nobody really works on the website definitely shows,
inde
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:57 AM, Rex Eastbourne
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For example, here's one immediate issue: Many of my friends have seen me
> using LyX and have asked where to get it. However, they have come back to me
> confused about the www.lyx.org website, specifically where to fin
