[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
MiKTeX is now very stable and thanks to Christian Schenk, the MiKTeX
developer in some fields especially developed for our needs.
Hmm... this gave me a thought. I'm not sure what the situation is
currently, but could the (eventual) LyX installer invoke the MikTeX
i
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 01:22:34PM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >A part of me even feels that checking out MSI might be worth it, if it's
> >less low level... I guess it depends on how much we require of
> >developers working with the installers. My hope was that you
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 12:24:26AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >OTOH, the NSIS language pretty much feels like assembler anyway ;-)
>
> Exactly my impression... Joost, is that on purpose?
I think it's the result of wanting a small memory footprint.
However, I'd guess that this would also
Yes. It would be easier if Bo could update SCons so they are included
automatically.
I heard it, although I have no idea what this file is. Will have a look later.
Cheers,
Bo
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Something I forgot to test: Does the official installer come wit the
latest versions of the xx_TOC.lyx files in the documentation?
If yes, we can close this bug:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2947
Yes. It would be easier if Bo could update SCons so they are included
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A part of me even feels that checking out MSI might be worth it, if it's
less low level... I guess it depends on how much we require of
developers working with the installers. My hope was that you wouldn't
need a detailed knowlegde of NSIS to understand, but I'm scepti
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The last days were hard: Since the release of LyX 1.4.4 I wrote now over
100 emails to give support. Besides two bugs in my installer, that are
now fixed, I noticed the following open bugs with the official installer:
- lyxc.exe crashes (unfortunately I couldn't reproduce this
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 11:03:14 pm Andre Poenitz wrote:
One advantage would be that # is used in lots of common languages
as comment whereas ; somehow smells like assembler.
; is used to start comments in lisp and scheme, no?
I wish the installers
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 11:03:14 pm Andre Poenitz wrote:
> One advantage would be that # is used in lots of common languages
> as comment whereas ; somehow smells like assembler.
; is used to start comments in lisp and scheme, no?
--
José Abílio
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
MiKTeX is now very stable and thanks to Christian Schenk, the MiKTeX
developer in some fields especially developed for our needs.
Hmm... this gave me a thought. I'm not sure what the situation is
currently, but could the (eventual) LyX installer invoke th
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 11:45:08PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Bo Peng schrieb:
1. Joost and Uwe: Why do you guys prefer ; instead of # for comments?
Do you mind if I change ; to #?
What would be the advantage, I think we both use ; so why changing this?
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 11:45:08PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Bo Peng schrieb:
> >1. Joost and Uwe: Why do you guys prefer ; instead of # for comments?
> >Do you mind if I change ; to #?
>
> What would be the advantage, I think we both use ; so why changing this?
One advantage would be that # is u
Uwe Stöhr schrieb:
I noticed the following open bugs with the official installer:
...
I forgot to mentione the still existing "missing textclasses.lst" problem I solved by chance by
running configure.py twice (as I reported several times on this list).
regards Uwe
Something I forgot to test: Does the official installer come wit the latest versions of the
xx_TOC.lyx files in the documentation?
If yes, we can close this bug:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2947
regards Uwe
Bo Peng schrieb:
Christian and I are comparing two installers, with some quick results
in http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/WindowsInstaller#toc4 , please modify
this page in defense of your installers because they might not be
tested fairly due to iterative installation/uninstallation.
I've currently
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Bo Peng wrote:
I tortured a PC with four 1.5.xsvn installers, and here are some
initial observations.
Hi, Joost and Uwe,
Christian and I are comparing two installers, with some quick results
in http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/WindowsInstaller#toc4 , please modify
this page in
I tortured a PC with four 1.5.xsvn installers, and here are some
initial observations.
Hi, Joost and Uwe,
Christian and I are comparing two installers, with some quick results
in http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/WindowsInstaller#toc4 , please modify
this page in defense of your installers because they
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, Bo Peng wrote:
I tortured a PC with four 1.5.xsvn installers, and here are some initial
observations.
Did you use something like a virtual machine that you "reset" after each
installation, or did you just activate the uninstall options? I'm asking
because when I did my t
18 matches
Mail list logo
